Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Rebased version of Yocto patches

2022-11-20 Thread Alex Ameen
Apologies for being unreachable, I'll revisit these today. On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 5:30 AM Richard Purdie < richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 18:32 +, Sam James wrote: > > > > > On 16 Apr 2022, at 18:58, Sam James wrote: > > > > > > Done after discussion w/

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Rebased version of Yocto patches

2022-11-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 18:32 +, Sam James wrote: > > > On 16 Apr 2022, at 18:58, Sam James wrote: > > > > Done after discussion w/ Alex (thanks!). Rebased on master after > > 2.4.7 release. > > Ping. Could we maybe get the easy ones in and then revisit > the bits which received comments

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Rebased version of Yocto patches

2022-11-19 Thread Sam James
> On 16 Apr 2022, at 18:58, Sam James wrote: > > Done after discussion w/ Alex (thanks!). Rebased on master after > 2.4.7 release. Ping. Could we maybe get the easy ones in and then revisit the bits which received comments (unclear to me what we need to do for those)? signature.asc

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Rebased version of Yocto patches

2022-04-16 Thread Alex Ameen
My bad I just saw the follow up emails. You're all good. On Sat, Apr 16, 2022, 1:29 PM Alex Ameen wrote: > Can you separate the flag changes from the others? > Since that's not backwards compatible it needs to be shelved for a future > major release. There's similar flag changes I've been

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Rebased version of Yocto patches

2022-04-16 Thread Alex Ameen
Can you separate the flag changes from the others? Since that's not backwards compatible it needs to be shelved for a future major release. There's similar flag changes I've been organizing into a pile. On Sat, Apr 16, 2022, 12:58 PM Sam James wrote: > Done after discussion w/ Alex (thanks!).