Re: file_magic broken

2000-02-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 07:32:37PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello, Gary! Hello =)O| The simplest way to reproduce on Linux-i386: Find "i*86 |" in libtool.m4 and remove it. Then run ./bootstrap ./configure make Hmmm. It works here. I forgot to mention that I'm

Re: installation of .la-files and linking against installed libraries

2000-03-06 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 10:24:44PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 6, 2000, Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wrote: "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It has been working forever! An odd use of the word `forever' :-) Okay, my bad. I thought you

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-13 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:42:44AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 12, 2000, Geoff Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You want to use exactly the same tools to do the relink as the user specified when doing the original link. So you want to use the same options, and the same

Re: Versioning question

2000-05-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bob. On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 03:26:42PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote: AFAICT, I'm bumping into problems with the versioning technique libtool uses. Here's my (variable names expanded) libintl_a_LDFLAGS: libintl_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:35:0 -release 0.10 -export-dynamic You probably

Re: Target for libtool?

2000-05-09 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 12:10:06PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Gary Hmm. I'm pretty sure autoconf 2.13 set target to "NONE". Yes, it did, definitely. But it makes the code much simpler not to give a default value

libtool-1.3.5

2000-05-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hello everyone, My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is there anything pending that I should incorporate into the tree before I roll it up and ship it out? Cheers, Gary. -- ___ _ ___ __

Re: libtool-1.3.5

2000-05-26 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 05:01:35AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On May 26, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My workload has now eased enough to allow to get back to hacking libtool, and I plan to release 1.3.5 this weekend. Is there anything pending tha

ANNOUNCE: libtool-1.3.5 released

2000-05-27 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
The Libtool Team is pleased to announce patch release 1.3.5 of GNU libtool. A complete tarball for libtool-1.3.5 will be available from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool and all GNU mirror sites in the next few days, along with diffs and xdeltas from release 1.3.4. In the mean time you can

Re: libtool patch to allow overriding AR_FLAGS

2000-05-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Jason, Fred, Sorry for the delay -- I am working through my email backlog after an extended period of busyness... On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 02:29:09PM -0800, Jason Merrill wrote: A while back, Fred Fish wrote this patch to allow an environment to override AR_FLAGS, presumably for use on

Re: test failed

2000-05-30 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 11:29:15PM -0500, Mocha wrote: # make check | grep FAIL FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: demo-exec.test FAIL: hardcode.test FAIL: build-relink.test that was on NetBSD-1.4Y/Alpha (ELF) and libtool 1.3.5. how can in find out why the test failed and

Re: Parsing nm output on AIX

2000-05-30 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Linus, Thanks for the report! On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 01:22:25PM +0200, Linus Nordberg wrote: The parsing of /usr/bin/nm output on AIX (at least 4.1.4.0 and 4.3.2.0) fails. config.log: ltconfig:1871: eval "nm conftest.o | sed -n -e 's/^.*[ ]\([BCDT]\)[][

Re: using libltdl for plugin design

2000-08-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 02:00:15PM -0700, Tom Matelich wrote: Hello, I am going to be implementing a plug-in system for a C++ application that needs to run on Linux, HP-UX, and Windows. I see that libltdl will load shared libraries for each of these platforms,

Re: Re[2]: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-02 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 07:40:09PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: Hello Charles, Charles S. Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CSW Well, the problem with libtool is that it's a developer's tool. Take CSW the gettext package, for instance. It uses some version of libtool that CSW does not

Re: DLL naming conventions

2000-09-04 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 04:39:51PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Sep 3, 2000, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * When installing a libtool (.la) library: - libfoo.la goes to $prefix/lib - libfooiface.dll goes to $prefix/bin - libfoo.

Re: Web page problem and release schedule

2000-09-09 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: [I hope this is the right place for the page problem...] I've noticed that the http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/future.html page seems to have a cvs conflict in it. Take a look a the left hand bar around the "Future

Re: Web page problem and release schedule

2000-09-13 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 11:05:28AM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:39:30PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote: Is there a release schedule for 1.4 or MLB(1.5?). Just curious. When it's ready =)O| I'm working really hard to get 1.4

Re: Re[2]: Support pw32 as gnu-win32 target

2000-09-16 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
I would Cc: the cygwin list, but it always bounces my messages... On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:55:16PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: Hello Gary, Hi! Unfortunately, there's no online archive of libtool-patches (why?), so I can't look there. Wierd I added it to geocrawler *ages* ago, bt they

Re: Can't install CVS libtool

2000-09-16 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 08:08:31PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to install CVS libtool in my environment and, after several attempts, I have to request some help. Oops, my bad. I hadn't tried a VPATH build since I removed ltconfig. I checked a fix in earlier

Re: AIX libltdl

2000-10-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote: Somewhat of a followup to the previous note: I also added native AIX shared library support to ltdl.c, it's the only choice on AIX 3 and 4.[01]. Also, the dlopen code on AIX 4.2 isn't all that stable, so it's better to use the native

Re: mail archives are hosed

2000-10-09 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Bruce! I'm Ccing the administrators list at gnu.org, to highlight the fact that the old archives are not available from either the old or new web address =(O| On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 12:41:44PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: FYI: the geocrawler record stops 9/16/00. Geocrawler seems pretty

Re: [PATCH] Fix for bootstrapping with latest CVS Autoconf

2000-10-12 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Morten Eriksen wrote: BTW, I noticed something which looks a bit strange to me. Beginning at approximately line 2180 of libtool.m4 (from the head CVS branch), there are a lot of shell variables which are set up. But some of them are just set to

Re: Problem with ltdl.h

2000-11-28 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:53:00PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Nov 28, 2000, Kevin Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 28 Nov 2000, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Nov 28, 2000, Bernard Dautrevaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in C++ struct lt_dlhandle automatically define a

Re: More info

2000-12-05 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 12:26:26AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Dec 3, 2000, "David Reid" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I get more information on failed tests? make VERBOSE=yes check You can also run the tests individually from the tests subdirectory: $ cd tests $ VERBOSE=1

Re: shared library loading modules?

2000-12-07 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:02:11AM -0600, Tod Milam wrote: Gary - Hi Todd. I have a library which loads modules. Both the library and modules are created using libtool. The problem is that when my application links to the library as a shared library, it crashes trying to load a module.

Re: [Patch] interlibrary dependency parsing in libltdl from CVS HEAD

2000-12-16 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:22:38PM +0200, Matthias Koeppe wrote: While trying to use the new interlibrary dependency resolution (load_deplibs) in the CVS version of libtool, we found out that it is never passed the list of library dependencies. The reason is a wrong define in ltdl.c which

Re: mailing list archives

2001-01-16 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 12:14:07PM +1100, Brian May wrote: "Brian" == Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brian Hello, according to the Brian URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/, the mailing Brian list archives for this mailing list are kept at Brian

Re: CVS problems

2001-01-28 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 12:51:15PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: Hello! I cannot update libtool from CVS anymore. The problem persists when I check out libtool from scratch. $ cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co libtool U libtool/.cvsignore U libtool/AUTHORS U libtool/ChangeLog U

Re: Libtool hassle on Solaris...

2001-01-29 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 04:54:43PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Jan 27, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: exit0x3fc ../snprintfv/snprintfv/.libs/li bsnprintfvc.a(format.o) Solaris' ld can't link non-PIC libraries into shared

Re: Bug in ltdl.c

2001-02-19 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Guenter Millahn wrote: Hello developers, I found a bug in devel branch libtool-20010219/libltdl/ltdl.c line 2526 must be changed from: static unsigned last_caller_id = -1; to: static int last_caller_id = -1; Yow! What was I thinking when I wrote that?

New libtool pages are up[

2001-02-26 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi people, I have just uploaded the changes to the libtool web pages that I have been working on for the last few days... Bruce, when you have your branch up and running could you add the details to these pages please? Robert, can you think of anything that is missing from the improved

Re: _init in shared libraries?

2001-03-09 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Bruce, On Friday 09 March 2001 5:15 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Bruce Korb writes: Is there supposed to be a way to tell GCC/collect2/ld to let me supply my own _init and _fini routines? ld -init NAME -fini NAME Or, am I required to have a pre-determined external name that I must

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-09 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Edward, Your patch is brilliant. Thankyou. I need to build a cygwin installation before I can test it, but by inspection it looks fine to me. This stuff is all I have left on my Libtool TODO list: As soon as we have it committed, I'd like to make a candidate release for libtool-1.4 so

C++ static constructors in libltdl modules [[Was Re: revised patch for glib compilation]]

2001-03-20 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 20 March 2001 4:29 am, Tim Janik wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: (another implication just sprang to my mind, GModule doesn't currently handle static C++ constructors Nor does libltdl, since lt_dlsym() doesn't really work with the C++ name mangler

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-29 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
business of merging MLB... any volunteers? =)O| Cheers, Gary. On Friday 30 March 2001 1:52 am, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi edward, I have been snowed this week, but I plan to integrate the libtool part of your patch in the next couple of days. I'm Cc:ing the automake list

Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

2001-03-29 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 29, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which reminds me... once this patch is in and working, I'd like to release libtool-1.3d (probably over the weekend) and declare a feature freeze in HEAD so that we

Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Sunday 01 April 2001 11:50 am, Michael Matz wrote: Hi, On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4. Huh? Seems like I'm missing something here. What is this bug

Re: Support for C++ under Win32

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 30 March 2001 3:54 am, Kevin Atkinson wrote: I was wondering what the status is for supporting C++ on Win32 in the multi-language branch of libtool. The g++ support for win32 should not be any worse than for other libtool supported platforms. In particular I would like to know

Re: Libtool eats redundant link objects

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 15 February 2001 4:47 am, Sam TH wrote: On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:12:12PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 01:02:52AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Feb 6, 2001, Sam TH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode-link c++ -o foo lib1.la lib2.la

Re: DLL problem

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 08 March 2001 9:09 pm, Lars Stavholm wrote: /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Lc:/ossasn1/win32.tgt/5.2.0/bin -o libencdec.la -rpath /home/stava/proj/nbap_alcap/encdec/lib -no-undefined -release 6.1C decoder_main.lo decoder_translate.lo decoder_util.lo

Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hello. On Sunday 01 April 2001 1:16 pm, Michael Matz wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I have applied the following to HEAD (and similar to MLB). Why also MLB? Was it really broken there too? I ask, because I _definitely_ got multiple libraries in link commands

Re: FYI: duplicate removal patch [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hello. On Sunday 01 April 2001 3:59 pm, Michael Matz wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I see. Argh, This then again means, that libtool will probably generate excessively large link commands for KDE. Yes it does =(O| Although ugly, Robert has applied the following

[ANNOUNCE] libtool-1.3d

2001-04-01 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
After 21 months in heavy development, the Libtool Team is pleased to announce alpha release 1.3d of GNU libtool. If this release generates a low number of bug reports, libtool-1.4 could be just a few short weeks away! libtool-1.3d is be available from alpha.gnu.org and via anonymous CVS,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] libtool-1.3d

2001-04-02 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Ooops. Well. Err. You should read it like a ChangeLog, with more recent changes at the top. Yeah, that's it. Cheers, Gary. On Monday 02 April 2001 5:46 am, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Gary V. Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 02

Re: AC_TRY_LINK with libtool libraries

2001-04-03 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 03 April 2001 9:28 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 3, 2001, "s_a_white" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gary second suggestion worked after removing the back slashes: Really? Wow! This is very good news, indeed. I'm quite surprised! I suppose we could arrange for AC_PROG_LIBTOOL

Re: duplicates

2001-04-05 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 02 April 2001 12:37 pm, Stephan Kulow wrote: Hi! I found this in libtol/Changelog 2001-03-31 Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ltmain.in: Remove the code for stripping duplicate deplibs from libtool link lines -- duplicates are somtimes necessary

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-11 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 11 April 2001 11:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running into a small problem when using our native compiler because HAVE_MEMCPY is not being set (or even checked for). Do you have AC_CHECK_FUNCS(memcpy) in your configure.in? Cheers, Gary. -- ___ _

Re: libtool-related problem with latest gtk/glib/pango/pygtk

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Skip! On Thursday 12 April 2001 1:20 pm, Skip Montanaro wrote: I'm starting to use the glib/gtk 1.3.3 from Python 2.1 on my Mandrake Linux 7.1 system using James Henstridge's pygtk wrappers. I have a very simple Python script that bombs with a number of these messages: Cannot load

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
to add the macro definition to aclocal.m4, and then autoconf to add the full expansion of the macro to the configure script. There is a nice appendix in The Goat Book with diagrams of how all of these interdependencies relate to one another. Dan HTH, Gary. From: "Gary V. Va

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
/configure.in. Dan From: "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wednesday 11 April 2001 11:03 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running into a small problem when using our native compiler because HAVE_MEMCPY is not being set (or even checked for). Do you have AC_C

Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (Re: libstdc++ execute tests)

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 12 April 2001 12:56 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote: - create some way to tell libtool ``look, this -L flag is to be used only when building this particular library, it's not needed for any of its dependencies after the library is installed.'' This might be accomplished by specifying

Re: Darwin and archive_cmds quoting

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Kevin, It looks like the echo command found by libtool is removing some of the backslashes that it is supposed to leave behind. Here is what it boils down to: $ echo=echo $ foo='`' $ quote='s/\([\\"\\`$]\)/\\\1/g' $ double_quote='s/\([\\"\\`]\)/\\\1/g' $

Re: crosscompiling dlls (linux-windows)

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 13 April 2001 4:57 pm, Guido Draheim wrote: I did lately try out the newest cvs version of the autotools, and I was amazed that libtool can not create dlls with it. It creates dlls fine for me. I had been using the libtool-version from the libsdl.org project, and it did work

Re: (no subject)

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Jacob, On Friday 13 April 2001 4:31 pm, jacob berkman wrote: i've tried using this patch against the branch-1-3 branch of cvs libtool, and it seems to work on hp-ux 11.00. by "seems to work" i mean that sawfish/librep build and run, whereas they did not with libtool 1.3.4 or 1.3.5.

Re: Darwin and archive_cmds quoting

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 16 April 2001 11:56 pm, Kevin Ryde wrote: I wrote: so maybe it's sed. Or maybe not. eval "bar=\\\"\` echo \"\$quote\" \`\\\"" echo $bar in bash gives what I assume is the expected result "s/\([\\"\\`$]\)/\\\1/g" whereas on Darwin

Re: SCO 5 shared libraries and -lc

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 16 April 2001 11:31 pm, Boyd Lynn Gerber wrote: On 17 Apr 2001, Kevin Ryde wrote: cc and gcc on sco know not to add -lc, so the test there looks like it would probably be right, except that archive_cmds is setup to use $LD, so it doesn't come into play. Maybe archive_cmds

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
ol Cheers, Gary. From: "Gary V. Vaughan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch. Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:18:16 +0100 Hello again Dan, Okay seems might I got the wrong e

Re: Mainline bootstrap failure (Re: libstdc++ execute tests)

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 5:43 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Content-Type: /; name="Attachment: 0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Okay to install... I wouldn't have thought we ned an okay for

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 4:35 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 17, 2001, Thomas Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Gary, Alexandre and the rest of the team! Gee! So you're still alive, after all! You had got me worried :-) Wow. Hi Thomas. I'm afraid I didn't even list you as a

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually... Robert Boehne has already merged my changes into the multi-language-branch. Okay, great. I'll evaluate your patch tonight (GMT). Cheers, Gary. Dan From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001 Do you

Re: Configuring libtool HEAD branch.

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001 - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still create a libname.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the shared object (just like the quirky

Re: Downtime... musings... libtool-1.4

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 18 April 2001 1:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gary V. Vaughan writes: Nup. Sorry. There is no way to log in to savannah at the moment, as there is still no SSL certificate =(O| I'm Ccing Loic, who might be able to shed some light, since I can't find any reference

Re: Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

2001-04-18 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 19 April 2001 1:01 am, Michael Matz wrote: On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Robert Boehne wrote: I'm in a bad situation with the loss of complete and draconian duplicate removal in dependency tracking. I've got 44 or so libraries that depend on each other, usually not in a loop ;P So

Re: Fix: Interlibrary dependencies SCO Uw7

2001-04-19 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Matt, On Thursday 19 April 2001 5:29 am, Matthew Schalit wrote: "Gary V. Vaughan" wrote: If you are sure that it is okay to link non-PIC objects from a static archive into a shared library, then this is the right thing to do. You can test this by manually linking a

Re: Duplicates in library auto-dependencies

2001-04-21 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
it in, along with the fix I posted and installed a few days ago. It was removed: 2001-03-31 Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ltmain.in: Remove the code for stripping duplicate deplibs from libtool link lines -- duplicates are somtimes necessary to satisfy inter-library

Re: 1.4 and hardcode.test on Solaris 2.6 with Sun C

2001-04-21 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 19 April 2001 5:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The hardcode.test doesn't work for Sun C: $ cc -V cc: Sun WorkShop 6 update 1 C 5.2 2000/09/11 I looked at hd-direct with: cat $file | (tr '\000-\037\200-\377' '\n' || cat) and found the following: ...

Re: Missing header dl.h on Uw7

2001-04-21 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
PROTECTED] | (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \ \___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/ home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key: http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc Index: ChangeLog from Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ltdl.m4 (AC_CHECK_HEADERS): UW7 has sys/d

Re: Libtool and Pkg-Config

2001-04-21 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi Eric, On Saturday 21 April 2001 6:12 pm, Eric Lemings wrote: Because of a growing number of config scripts for packages in GNOME 1.2 (e.g. glib-config, xml-config, orbit-config. etc), development of GNOME 2.0 spawned a separate tool called pkg-config that allows all packages to use one

libtool-1.4

2001-04-21 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hi everyone, Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are less than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD. I would be grateful for any host triplets (as reported by the libtool configure script) on which you are able to run

Re: Fix: Interlibrary dependencies SCO Uw7

2001-04-22 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Saturday 21 April 2001 9:36 pm, Matthew Schalit wrote: Hi Gary, I gave your patch a try and it didn't work correctly in the end, which was odd. I looked at configure, and the patch was corrupted. The square brackets were missing: My bad. Since libtool.m4 is processed by m4, one level of

Re: Missing header dl.h on Uw7

2001-04-22 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Saturday 21 April 2001 10:02 pm, Matthew Schalit wrote: The only other thing I noticed was this section in libltdl/configure: --- echo "$as_me:7795: checking whether deplibs are loaded by dlopen" 5 echo $ECHO_N

Re: libtool-1.4

2001-04-22 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Saturday 21 April 2001 11:20 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Gary V. Vaughan writes: Failing major disasters, or the discovery of a showstopper, there are less than 18 hours to go before the release of libtool-1.4 from CVS HEAD. I think that's going to be a problem for you: libtool$ make

Re: shared library linking on Darwin

2001-04-23 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Sunday 22 April 2001 1:40 am, Kevin Ryde wrote: Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Have either of you had any success with my workaround? make ECHO=/bin/sh `pwd`/libtool --fallback-echo Or something equivalent... Not quite sure I understand. Should that be ECHO=/bin

Re: 1.3e (1.910) test results for sparc-sun-solaris2.8 (FAIL)

2001-04-23 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 23 April 2001 10:26 am, Russ Allbery wrote: I assume that these are mostly the known Solaris failures. Configuring libtool 1.3e (1.910 2001/04/23 00:34:53) checking host

Re: 1.3e (1.910) test results for hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00 (FAIL)

2001-04-23 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 23 April 2001 7:08 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Russ Allbery writes: I was unable to even get the test suite to complete on this platform; every time the mdemo tests ran, the program it was running went runaway and had to be kill -9'd. I got tired of doing this by about the

Re: libtool 1.4

2001-04-23 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Sunday 22 April 2001 7:09 am, you wrote: Hello. A friend told me the about your libtool 1.4 test mail, so I tried it on a few platforms.. Great! Thankyou for posting your results. I am unable to reproduce your quote.test failure on my Solaris 8 box with the current HEAD revision. If

Re: libtool-1.4 release

2001-04-23 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 23 April 2001 2:00 am, I wrote: I'm holding off the release for a day or two... Revised release date tomorrow April 24, around 10pm GMT unless someone points out a serious enough problem to me before then. Cheers, Gary. -- ___ _ ___ __ _

FYI: TESTS_ENVIRONMENT patch

2001-04-24 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] + + From Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] + * tests/Makefile.am (TESTS_ENVIRONMENT): Make sure the *.test + scripts get the same make that was used in the top level + directory. + 2001-04-23 Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * doc/PLATFORMS: Updated with more platforms

Re: libtool-1.4

2001-04-24 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 23 April 2001 3:30 pm, Michael Matz wrote: Hi, On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: I must say that my spidey-sense tells me that `static inline' is a GNU extension... Yep, but the autoconf macro AC_C_INLINE is used, which #define's inline away in config.h, if inline

Re: libtool-1.4

2001-04-25 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Wednesday 25 April 2001 8:33 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 24, 2001, Gary V.Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since I don't want to hold up the release any longer, I am going to break the commit rules and remove all use of the inline keyword (and the AC_C_INLINE) from libltdl before

[ANNOUNCE] GNU Libtool 1.4

2001-04-26 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
Hello Libtoolers, On this, the 2nd anniversary of the release of libtool-1.3, the Libtool Team is delighted to announce Libtool version 1.4: Available now from ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.tar.gz and shortly from all GNU mirror sites. You will find diffs and xdeltas from

Re: crosscompiling dll linux-mingw32

2001-04-28 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Thursday 26 April 2001 1:18 pm, Guido Draheim wrote: Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 26, 2001, Guido Draheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did just need to change a single line in ltmain.sh which enabled me afterwards to actually *build* a dll. Looks like you were not using

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-07 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
on architectures that require install time relinking (such as HPUX). Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool

Re: libtool

2001-05-09 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
hed an older version of grep (1.3). You might wanna let people know they want to keep this up to date. It took me a very long time to narrow things down to it!!! Okay thanks for the heads up. Sorry to bother you. No bother. Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary

alpha release schedule [Was Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates]

2001-03-30 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Friday 30 March 2001 4:07 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Mar 29, 2001, Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 30 March 2001 2:23 am, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Not really. We really must fix the bug that causes us to remove duplicate libraries before releasing 1.4. Huh

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

2001-05-14 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
to be widely used and probably is fairly stable by now, I guess. Thoughts? Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

2001-05-14 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' ` `(_~)_ Tech' Authorhttp://sources.redhat.com/autobook

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

2001-05-15 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
the patch queue when your code is still on a branch, since you will likely have to port HEAD patchs into binary-branch so that the eventual merge is not too bad... Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http

Re: I think binary-branch is almost ready for play time

2001-05-15 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Tuesday 15 May 2001 4:01 am, Bruce Korb wrote: Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Hi Bruce, On Monday 14 May 2001 1:31 am, Bruce Korb wrote: When this invocation fires, an anonymous template is created with that text and then processed. The output is redirected to an unlinked file

Re: [MLB] BUG in install when piecewise linking

2001-05-17 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
, it would be nice to try to detect the failure mode and warn the user that they need to install GNU sed for sanity's sake. Failing that, add something to the TODO file so we don't forget that it needs addressing. Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk

Re: DLLs with mingw or cygwin

2001-05-26 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
(see .sig). However, I didn't want to hold up 1.4 any longer by doing the testing that I should have done on cygwin, so it is possibly somewhat unpolished... Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http

Re: HOWTO Build one library from source in multiple subdirs?

2001-05-28 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
? If not what approach do you suggest? Yes it does. Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool

Re: HOWTO Build one library from source in multiple subdirs?

2001-05-30 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
bin_PROGRAMS = baz baz_SOURCES = baz.c baz_LDADD= ./libbar.la ... HTH, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software

Re: cygwin libtool breakage

2001-06-04 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 04 June 2001 12:41 pm, Robert Collins wrote: - Original Message - From: Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 11:25 AM Subject: Re: cygwin libtool breakage On Saturday 02 June 2001 5:43 pm

Re: cygwin libtool breakage

2001-06-04 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Monday 04 June 2001 2:22 am, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Gary V. Vaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] gary@MALACHI ~/libtool$ export CC=gcc I haven't done this... can the cygwin environment test ac_require ac_prog_cc ? In autoconf-2.13 it should have done

Re: cygwin libtool breakage

2001-06-05 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
in configure.in. If I am along the right lines, it seems likely that 2.50 won't exhibit this problem. Unless we find out something to the contrary, I'll apply your fix right after I'm done with the merge. Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org

Re: dll installation logic

2001-06-08 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
used.. and installing every dll into either /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin almost makes sense. Thoughts? (This is the failure reason for depdemo-exec when depdemo has been built with shared librarys). -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist

Re: Paul Sokolovsky's ld --auto-import

2001-06-10 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
that are compatible with existing programs. This is a good thing. Cool! However MS's linker and probably borlands don't have that functionality. (I _love_ free software!). Me too =)O| Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research

FYI: out of town for a week

2001-06-11 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
I'm not ignoring everyone -- I am in London (without net access :-O) until the weekend. See ya then... Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker

Re: Fortran support in multi-language branch?

2001-06-16 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
will have migrated into libtool.m4, and can be written with the aid of autoconf's shell macros. Cheers, Gary. -- ())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org) ( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk,_()) / )= GNU Hacker http

Re: dll installation logic

2001-06-17 Thread Gary V . Vaughan
On Sunday 17 June 2001 8:25 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Jun 8, 2001, Gary V. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately this probably comes dow to wrapper scripts, which is ugly too Since we're talking Cygwin, shouldn't it be a wrapper executable? Good point. -- ())_. Gary V

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >