Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Peter O'Gorman wrote: I assume you mean the libtool-1.5 is not available on gnu.org since it was hacked in March. I believe it's reappearance is waiting on a libtool admin letting the relevant folks know the md5 checksum for that release. The checksum I have is 0e1844f25e2ad74c3715b5776d017545

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 12:38 AM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: The checksum I have is 0e1844f25e2ad74c3715b5776d017545 in case anyone is interested :) I am interested :-) Rob rolled that release, and I don't have a tarball of 1.5 from which to generate the sum myself :-( What date did

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: I assume you mean the libtool-1.5 is not available on gnu.org since it was hacked in March. I believe it's reappearance is waiting on a libtool admin letting the relevant folks know the md5 checksum for that release. The

RE: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Boehne, Robert wrote: While we're on the subject (sort of) Peter expressed some interest in becoming a co-maintainer. I think that is a good idea, what about you? That is something I would like to see as well. Bob == Bob Friesenhahn

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Rob, Peter, Boehne, Robert wrote: While we're on the subject (sort of) Peter expressed some interest in becoming a co-maintainer. I think that is a good idea, what about you? Absolutely! My attention to the libtool lists has been intermittent to say the least while I am working on m4... and

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a copy of libtool-1.5.tar.gz which was retrieved on April 15. The MD5 checksum is also 0e1844f25e2ad74c3715b5776d017545. I have a copy dated April 14 with the same MD5 checksum. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-10 Thread Richard Dawe
Hello. Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: [snip] I am interested :-) Rob rolled that release, and I don't have a tarball of 1.5 from which to generate the sum myself :-( What date did you download it? Hopefully, very soon after the upload judging by the

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-09 Thread Ellen Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm swimming in a libiconv protage on QNX and I have a problem with shared library namming. First, the original configure script in libiconv-1.9.1 doesn't know the QNX platform. After some discussions with a QNX people, I got the informations to rebuild all the

Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 8:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That means I have a dependancy problem but I don't know what to update. I wanted to try libtool-1.5 but it that's a simple ghost!! I assume you mean the libtool-1.5 is not available on gnu.org since it was hacked in March. I

Re: Réf. : Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-09 Thread Max Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Max, Sorry for the mistake but in fact I invoke libtoolize -f -c' and 'automake-1.7 -a -c '! Anyway, I get a new ltmain.sh, the one is stored in my libtool (1.4.3) directory. So, either ltmain.sh is bad in libtool-1.4.3 (I don't think so) or the source file

Re: Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: ltmain.sh and configure

2003-09-09 Thread Max Bowsher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, Ok Max. Now I remember also that I had to do 'aclocal-1.7 -I ./m4 ...' and according to the libiconv developper, he use slightly modified libtool1.5 files. That's the reason why I get a serial 47. So, I suppose I have to update aclocal and automake to maybe 1.8