Hi Alan,
* Alan W. Irwin wrote on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:23:00AM CEST:
> On 2006-05-15 06:11+0200 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >The following is where I stopped at, due to insufficient development
> >packages installed on my system. Let's see how this works for you.
> >
> [patch followed]
>
> I
On 2006-05-15 15:23-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Once the configure script worked properly, I followed with make, make
install, and a build and execution of our 96 test plot examples which gave
identical results to our standard PLplot tree (without your patch or mine)
and libtool-1.5.22.
This is n
On 2006-05-15 06:11+0200 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[...]So, the patch below moves those compiler tests up, and invokes the
libtool macro afterwards. This eliminates that circular dependency.
Since in PL_GET_DLNAME (used from within cf/tcl.ac) you use the built
libtool script to gather further infor
Hi Alan,
* Alan W. Irwin wrote on Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:47:16PM CEST:
> On 2006-05-14 05:42+0200 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Alan W. Irwin wrote on Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:07:37AM CEST:
> >>Here is the message I got from our bootstrap script.
> >*snip*
> >
> >Please post a link to the code that
On 2006-05-14 05:42+0200 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hi Alan,
* Alan W. Irwin wrote on Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:07:37AM CEST:
Here is the original problem report.
I have ifort 9.1 installed. With a clean plplot checkout and the latest
autotools (as recommended) plplot now fails to build. T
Hi Alan,
* Alan W. Irwin wrote on Sun, May 14, 2006 at 01:07:37AM CEST:
>
> Here is the original problem report.
>
> I have ifort 9.1 installed. With a clean plplot checkout and the latest
> autotools (as recommended) plplot now fails to build. The fortran
> compiler is detected and f95
We have just added a fortran 9x interface for the PLplot package (to join
our already existing fortran 77 interface), and it works well with gfortran
when configured using the latest stable autotools packages from GNU. To be
specific, the tarballs are autoconf-2.59.tar.bz2, automake-1.9.6.tar.bz2
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:10:26AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:43:43AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> >> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> The Makefile.am does include:
> >>
> >> .f90.o:
> >> $(FCCOMPIL
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:43:43AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
>> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
>> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops
Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:43:43AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
>> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
>> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:43:43PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops with
> > libtool-1.5.x, since it doesn't
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:43:43AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops with
> > libtool-1.5.x, since it doesn't suppor
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
> 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops with
> libtool-1.5.x, since it doesn't support it. Current CVS Libtool, which
> will hopefully soon be Libtool-2.0,
13 matches
Mail list logo
