Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Nicolas,

To the Fortran part of your answer:

* Nicolas Joly wrote on Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:22:10PM CEST:
 On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

  Could you also try the new test suite?
make check TESTS=
  and send tests/testsuite.log for errors.
 
 Got 3 failures; log attached.

The first one I can't explain yet (Gary?), the other two are easy:
libtool doesn't support Fortran on Tru64 yet.  I'm actually surprised
there aren't more failures, both Fortran-related in the old testsuite,
and non-Fortran related in the new one.  :)

For the rest of this mail, I assume this link has suitable(?)
documentation for these Fortran compilers:
http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/Fortran/docs/unix-um/dfumtoc.htm

data points:
- the doc mentions that undefined symbols are not allowed -- but ld(1)
  says otherwise.  Maybe it works with
allow_undefined_flag=\${wl}-expect_unresolved \${wl}\*
  or, if it doesn't, we need to set
allow_undefined_flag=unsupported
- all of `-soname ..', `-msym', `-set_version ..', `-update_registry ..'
  seem unsupported by f77/f95, but I believe they should be supplied to
  ld by prefixing ${wl} everywhere -- not really sure, though.

This suggests that it should be possible to write archive_cmds (and
possibly archive_expsyms_cmds) in libltdl/m4/libtool.m4:_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS
like a mixture of the $GCC and the non-$GCC case, using $cc_basename and
$GCC as decision criteria.  Would you be willing to work on this?
Should I create a preliminary patch you could test?  Is there also a
`f90' available on this platform?

 uname -m = alpha
 uname -r = V5.1
 uname -s = OSF1
 uname -v = 2650

 Failed tests:
 libtool 2.1a test suite test groups:
 
  NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME
   KEYWORDS
 
4: libtoolize.at:287  copy ltdl.m4 with shared macro directory
9: convenience.at:74  F77 convenience archives
   F77
   10: convenience.at:116 FC convenience archives
   FC


 # -*- compilation -*-
 9. convenience.at:74: testing ...
 ./convenience.at:75: test -n $F77 || (exit 77)

 libtool: link: creating libb.la
 libtool: link: ( cd .libs  rm -f libb.la  ln -s ../libb.la 
 libb.la )
 libtool: link: (cd .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a  ar x 
 /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/9/./.libs/liba.a)
 libtool: link: (cd .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a  ar x 
 /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/9/./.libs/libb.a)
 libtool: link: f77 -shared -expect_unresolved \*  .libs/c.o
 .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a/a.o  .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a/b.o-msym -soname 
 libcee.so.0 `test -n 0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | 
 /usr/bin/sed -e 1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o 
 .libs/libcee.so.0.0.0
 f77: Severe: Invalid file name - must be of the form name.suffix : *
 ./convenience.at:108: $LIBTOOL --tag=F77 --mode=link $F77 $FFLAGS $LDFLAGS 
 -static -o main_static main.lo libcee.la
 stderr:
 libtool: link: cannot find the library `libcee.la' or unhandled argument 
 `libcee.la'
 stdout:
 ./convenience.at:108: exit code was 1, expected 0
 9. convenience.at:74: 9. F77 convenience archives (convenience.at:74): FAILED 
 (convenience.at:108)
 
 # -*- compilation -*-
 10. convenience.at:116: testing ...
 ./convenience.at:117: test -n $FC || (exit 77)
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g a.f  -o .libs/a.o
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g a.f -o a.o /dev/null 21
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g b.f  -o .libs/b.o
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g b.f -o b.o /dev/null 21
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g c.f  -o .libs/c.o
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g c.f -o c.o /dev/null 21
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g main.f  -o .libs/main.o
 libtool: compile:  f95 -c -g main.f -o main.o /dev/null 21
 libtool: link: ar cru .libs/liba.a .libs/a.o 
 libtool: link: ranlib .libs/liba.a
 libtool: link: creating liba.la
 libtool: link: ( cd .libs  rm -f liba.la  ln -s ../liba.la 
 liba.la )
 libtool: link: ar cru .libs/libb.a .libs/b.o 
 libtool: link: ranlib .libs/libb.a
 libtool: link: creating libb.la
 libtool: link: ( cd .libs  rm -f libb.la  ln -s ../libb.la 
 libb.la )
 libtool: link: (cd .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a  ar x 
 /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/10/./.libs/liba.a)
 libtool: link: (cd .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a  ar x 
 /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/10/./.libs/libb.a)
 libtool: link: f95 -shared -expect_unresolved \*  .libs/c.o
 .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a/a.o  .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a/b.o-msym -soname 
 libcee.so.0 `test -n 0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | 
 /usr/bin/sed -e 1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o 
 .libs/libcee.so.0.0.0
 f95: Severe: Invalid file name - must be of the form name.suffix : *
 ./convenience.at:150: $LIBTOOL --tag=FC --mode=link $FC $FCFLAGS $LDFLAGS 
 -static -o main_static main.lo libcee.la
 stderr:
 libtool: link: cannot find the library `libcee.la' or unhandled argument 
 `libcee.la'
 stdout:
 ./convenience.at:150: exit 

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-06 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 Hi Nicolas,
 
 To the Fortran part of your answer:
 
 * Nicolas Joly wrote on Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:22:10PM CEST:
  On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:43:40AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 
   Could you also try the new test suite?
 make check TESTS=
   and send tests/testsuite.log for errors.
  
  Got 3 failures; log attached.
 
 The first one I can't explain yet (Gary?)

Don;t worry to much about it. I updated CVS libtool in the mean time,
and this one is gone.

 the other two are easy:
 libtool doesn't support Fortran on Tru64 yet.  I'm actually surprised
 there aren't more failures, both Fortran-related in the old testsuite,
 and non-Fortran related in the new one.  :)
 
 For the rest of this mail, I assume this link has suitable(?)
 documentation for these Fortran compilers:
 http://h21007.www2.hp.com/dspp/files/unprotected/Fortran/docs/unix-um/dfumtoc.htm
 
 data points:
 - the doc mentions that undefined symbols are not allowed -- but ld(1)
   says otherwise.  Maybe it works with
 allow_undefined_flag=\${wl}-expect_unresolved \${wl}\*
   or, if it doesn't, we need to set
 allow_undefined_flag=unsupported
 - all of `-soname ..', `-msym', `-set_version ..', `-update_registry ..'
   seem unsupported by f77/f95, but I believe they should be supplied to
   ld by prefixing ${wl} everywhere -- not really sure, though.

It seems correct.

Tru64 fortran compilers do not support `-expect_unresolved \*' option
directly. Passing it prefixed with `-Wl,' solves the problem.

All others seems to work directly :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [testsuite.dir/9] f77 -v -shared -Wl,-expect_unresolved 
-Wl,\* .libs/c.o .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a/a.o .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a/b.o -msym 
-soname libcee.so.0 `test -n 0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 
| /usr/bin/sed -e 1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o 
.libs/libcee.so.0.0.0 
/usr/bin/cc -v -shared -Wl,-expect_unresolved -Wl,* .libs/c.o 
.libs/libcee.lax/liba.a/a.o .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a/b.o -msym -soname 
libcee.so.0 -set_version 0.0.0:0.0 -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o 
.libs/libcee.so.0.0.0 -O4 -qlshpf -lUfor -lfor -lFutil -lm -lots -lm_c32 -lmld 
-lexc 

/usr/lib/cmplrs/cc.dtk/ld -o .libs/libcee.so.0.0.0 -expect_unresolved * -msym 
-soname libcee.so.0 -set_version 0.0.0:0.0 -update_registry .libs/so_locations 
-g0 -O4 -shared .libs/c.o .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a/a.o 
.libs/libcee.lax/libb.a/b.o -qlshpf -lUfor -lfor -lFutil -lm -lots -lm_c32 
-lmld -lexc -lc 
/usr/lib/cmplrs/cc.dtk/ld: 
0.03u 0.03s 0:00 35% 0+10k 11+21io 0pf+0w 10stk+1800mem

 This suggests that it should be possible to write archive_cmds (and
 possibly archive_expsyms_cmds) in libltdl/m4/libtool.m4:_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS
 like a mixture of the $GCC and the non-$GCC case, using $cc_basename and
 $GCC as decision criteria.  Would you be willing to work on this?

I'll try, even if i'm not a fortran programmer myself.

 Should I create a preliminary patch you could test?

Yes, please.

 Is there also a `f90' available on this platform?

  f90 - invokes the Compaq Fortran 90 (formerly DIGITAL Fortran 90) compiler
  f95 - invokes the Compaq Fortran 95 (formerly DIGITAL Fortran 95) compiler
  f77 - invokes the Compaq Fortran 90 (formerly DIGITAL Fortran 90) compiler
  f77 -old_f77 - invokes the Compaq Fortran 77 (formerly DIGITAL Fortran 77)
  compiler

  uname -m = alpha
  uname -r = V5.1
  uname -s = OSF1
  uname -v = 2650
 
  Failed tests:
  libtool 2.1a test suite test groups:
  
   NUM: FILE-NAME:LINE TEST-GROUP-NAME
KEYWORDS
  
 4: libtoolize.at:287  copy ltdl.m4 with shared macro directory
 9: convenience.at:74  F77 convenience archives
F77
10: convenience.at:116 FC convenience archives
FC
 
 
  # -*- compilation -*-
  9. convenience.at:74: testing ...
  ./convenience.at:75: test -n $F77 || (exit 77)
 
  libtool: link: creating libb.la
  libtool: link: ( cd .libs  rm -f libb.la  ln -s ../libb.la 
  libb.la )
  libtool: link: (cd .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a  ar x 
  /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/9/./.libs/liba.a)
  libtool: link: (cd .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a  ar x 
  /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/testsuite.dir/9/./.libs/libb.a)
  libtool: link: f77 -shared -expect_unresolved \*  .libs/c.o
  .libs/libcee.lax/liba.a/a.o  .libs/libcee.lax/libb.a/b.o-msym 
  -soname libcee.so.0 `test -n 0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 
  0.0.0:0.0 | /usr/bin/sed -e 1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations 
  -o .libs/libcee.so.0.0.0
  f77: Severe: Invalid file name - must be of the form name.suffix : *
  ./convenience.at:108: $LIBTOOL --tag=F77 --mode=link $F77 $FFLAGS $LDFLAGS 
  -static -o main_static main.lo libcee.la
  stderr:
  libtool: link: cannot find the library `libcee.la' or unhandled argument 
  `libcee.la'
  stdout:
  ./convenience.at:108: exit code was 1, expected 0
  9. convenience.at:74: 9. F77 convenience archives 

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Nicolas,

* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 03:36:48PM CEST:
 On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
  * Nicolas Joly wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:57:01PM CEST:
  
   Here follow a small summary for libtool HEAD on my Tru64 v5.1B
   workstation.
  
  Could you report `libtool --version', so that, in case of doubt, we know
  which patches were incorporated and which weren't?
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [temp/libtool] ./libtool --version
 ltmain.sh (GNU libtool 1.2109 2005/10/02 08:54:02) 2.1a
 
  If it's before 2005-10-03, I ask you not to update until Gary's BSD make
  patch is in (so you don't unnecessarily experience a known and pending
  issue).
 
 I'm aware of this problem. For now, i'm using GNU make; for Tru64 make
 we'll see later.

You could try 290-gary-pmake-dot-slash-ignorance.diff, I believe it
should work.  But I bet Gary will have applied it before you read this.
:)

   * With `lt_ECHO='printf %s\\n'; export lt_ECHO' set, configure
 generate numerous `sed: Function 1s/^X//\n cannot be parsed'
 messages.
  
  Should've been `lt_ECHO='printf %s\n'; export lt_ECHO'
  Sorry, I believe it was me who posted that wrongly back then.
 
 I've just restarted with the correct value. configure now pass, but
 make aborts with:
 
 [...]
 source='libltdl/loaders/preopen.c' 
 object='libltdl/loaders/libltdl_libltdl_la-preopen.lo' libtool=yes \
 DEPDIR=.deps depmode=tru64 /bin/sh ./libltdl/config/depcomp \
 /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC   --mode=compile cc -DLTDL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H 
 -DLT_CONFIG_H='config.h' -I. -I. -I.  -DLTDLOPEN=libltdl -I. -I. -Ilibltdl 
 -I./libltdl -I./libltdl/libltdl   -g -c -o 
 libltdl/loaders/libltdl_libltdl_la-preopen.lo `test -f 
 'libltdl/loaders/preopen.c' || echo './'`libltdl/loaders/preopen.c
 ./libtool: bad substitution
 
 with `set -x', in libtool script:
 
 [...]
 base_compile= cc -DLTDL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLT_CONFIG_H=config.h -I. -I. 
 -I. -
 DLTDLOPEN=libltdl -I. -I. -Ilibltdl -I./libltdl -I./libltdl/libltdl -g -c
 + func_stripname -Wc,  -Wc,-MD 
 func_stripname_result=-Wc,-MD
 ./libtool: bad substitution

Ahh.  Please add another `set -x' at the top of func_stripname to see
which of the parameter substitutions fail.

Hmm, the Tru64 shell in POSIX mode documents support for ${foo#bar} and
${foo%bar}.  I bet there's a shell bug lingering when bar is either
double-quoted or bar is another parameter like `${1}'.  Can you play
around a bit to try this?  For example, pdksh fails on
  ${1%$2}
but works if we do
  arg2=$2
  ${1%$arg2}
instead.  Maybe
  arg1=$1
  arg2=$2
  echo ${arg1%$arg2}, ${arg1%$arg2}
both work instead?

We should then either fix func_stripname (and a couple of other ones)
to work around this bug or fix _LT_CHECK_XSI_SHELL to expose the bug
(and turn off the fast substitution functions).

   libtool: link:  cc -shared -input .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp 
   .libs/foo2.o   -lm ./.libs/libsub.so -soname libfoo2.so.0 `test -n 
   0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | /usr/bin/sed -e 
   1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0
   ld:
   can't open input file '-soname'(No such file or directory)
   ld: Usage: ld [options] file [...]
   gmake[4]: *** [libfoo2.la] Error 1
   gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo'
   FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
  
  Weird.  The linker seems to need a different option order than given by
  the compiler driver.  Does it work if you issue this manually?
  
cd $top_builddir/tests/mdemo
make  # this should create .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp
cc -shared -input .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp -soname libfoo2.so.0 `test 
  -n 0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | /usr/bin/sed -e 
  1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0 
  .libs/foo2.o -lm ./.libs/libsub.so 
 
 No, same result.
 
  You can try adding `-v' to see which options' order is messed up.
  Could you issue the same with the C++ compiler driver `CC' to see
  whether it has the same bug?
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [tests/mdemo] cc -v -shared -input 
 .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp -soname libfoo2.so.0 `test -n 0.0.0:0.0  print 
 -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | /usr/bin/sed -e 1s/^X//` -u pdate_registry 
 .libs/so_locations -o .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0 .libs/foo2.o -lm 
 ./.libs/libsub.so 
 
 /usr/lib/cmplrs/cc.dtk/ld -o .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0 -input -soname 
 libfoo2.so.0 -set_version 0.0.0:0.0 -g0 -O1 -shared 
 .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp -u pdate_registry .libs/so_locations .libs/foo2.o 
 -lm ./.libs/libsub.so -lc 
 ld:
 can't open input file '-soname'(No such file or directory)
 ld: Usage: ld [options] file [...]
 /usr/lib/cmplrs/cc.dtk/ld: 
 0.00u 0.00s 0:00 0% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w 0stk+120mem
 
 According to the Tru64 cc(1) man page, we need to use `-input_to_ld'
 flag instead of `-input' which is only known by the linker. With this
 small modification all previously failed tests are now successful.

Ahh, ok.  Do I gather correctly that the 

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-04 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 Hi Nicolas,
 
 I've removed libtool@ from the list of recipients -- no need to discuss
 this on both lists.
 
 * Nicolas Joly wrote on Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:57:01PM CEST:
  On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
  
   This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
   on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
   next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.
  
  Sorry for the delay, i was away and/or busy. :-(
 
 No problem.  Thank you for the feedback!
 
  Here follow a small summary for libtool HEAD on my Tru64 v5.1B
  workstation.
 
 Could you report `libtool --version', so that, in case of doubt, we know
 which patches were incorporated and which weren't?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [temp/libtool] ./libtool --version
ltmain.sh (GNU libtool 1.2109 2005/10/02 08:54:02) 2.1a

 If it's before 2005-10-03, I ask you not to update until Gary's BSD make
 patch is in (so you don't unnecessarily experience a known and pending
 issue).

I'm aware of this problem. For now, i'm using GNU make; for Tru64 make
we'll see later.

  * Without modification, configure works fine but make abort with
`./config.status: print: not found' error message.
 
 Weird.
 
  * With `BIN_SH=xpg4; export BIN_SH' set before configuring and
building both configure and make work. `make check' report 4
failures (verbose run attached for the 1st one):
 FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
 FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
 FAIL: tests/mdemo-dryrun.test
 FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
NB: I'm getting the same results with the patch i previoulsy posted,
which swap `print -r' and `ksh' tests in _LT_PROG_ECHO_BACKSLASH
macro.
 
 This seems to be an unrelated failure, see below.
 
  * With `lt_ECHO='printf %s\\n'; export lt_ECHO' set, configure
generate numerous `sed: Function 1s/^X//\n cannot be parsed'
messages.
 
 Should've been `lt_ECHO='printf %s\n'; export lt_ECHO'
 Sorry, I believe it was me who posted that wrongly back then.

I've just restarted with the correct value. configure now pass, but
make aborts with:

[...]
source='libltdl/loaders/preopen.c' 
object='libltdl/loaders/libltdl_libltdl_la-preopen.lo' libtool=yes \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=tru64 /bin/sh ./libltdl/config/depcomp \
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC   --mode=compile cc -DLTDL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H 
-DLT_CONFIG_H='config.h' -I. -I. -I.  -DLTDLOPEN=libltdl -I. -I. -Ilibltdl 
-I./libltdl -I./libltdl/libltdl   -g -c -o 
libltdl/loaders/libltdl_libltdl_la-preopen.lo `test -f 
'libltdl/loaders/preopen.c' || echo './'`libltdl/loaders/preopen.c
./libtool: bad substitution

with `set -x', in libtool script:

[...]
base_compile= cc -DLTDL -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLT_CONFIG_H=config.h -I. -I. -I. -
DLTDLOPEN=libltdl -I. -I. -Ilibltdl -I./libltdl -I./libltdl/libltdl -g -c
+ func_stripname -Wc,  -Wc,-MD 
func_stripname_result=-Wc,-MD
./libtool: bad substitution

 *snip*
  /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link cc  -g -no-undefined -module 
  -export-symbols-regex libfoo2.*  -o libfoo2.la -rpath 
  /home/njoly/temp/libtool/_inst/lib foo2.lo -lm libsub.la 
  libtool: link: generating symbol list for `libfoo2.la'
  libtool: link: /usr/bin/nm -B  .libs/foo2.o   | sed -n -e 's/^.*[   
  ]\([BCDEGQRST][BCDEGQRST]*\)[   ][  ]*\([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*\)$/\1 \2 
  \2/p' | /usr/bin/sed 's/.* //' | sort | uniq  .libs/libfoo2.exp
  libtool: link: /usr/bin/grep -E -e libfoo2.* .libs/libfoo2.exp  
  .libs/libfoo2.expT
  libtool: link: mv -f .libs/libfoo2.expT .libs/libfoo2.exp
  libtool: link: for i in `cat .libs/libfoo2.exp`; do printf %s %s\\n 
  -exported_symbol /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo/libsub.la  
  .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp; done; printf %s\\n -hidden 
  .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp
  libtool: link:  cc -shared -input .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp 
  .libs/foo2.o   -lm ./.libs/libsub.so -soname libfoo2.so.0 `test -n 
  0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | /usr/bin/sed -e 
  1s/^X//` -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0
  ld:
  can't open input file '-soname'(No such file or directory)
  ld: Usage: ld [options] file [...]
  gmake[4]: *** [libfoo2.la] Error 1
  gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo'
  FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
 
 Weird.  The linker seems to need a different option order than given by
 the compiler driver.  Does it work if you issue this manually?
 
   cd $top_builddir/tests/mdemo
   make  # this should create .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp
   cc -shared -input .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0.exp -soname libfoo2.so.0 `test -n 
 0.0.0:0.0  print -r X-set_version 0.0.0:0.0 | /usr/bin/sed -e 1s/^X//` 
 -update_registry .libs/so_locations -o .libs/libfoo2.so.0.0.0 .libs/foo2.o 
 -lm ./.libs/libsub.so 

No, same result.

 You can try adding `-v' to see which options' order is messed up.
 Could you issue the same with the C++ compiler 

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-10-03 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 Hi Nicolas, others,

Hi Ralf,

 This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
 on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
 next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.

Sorry for the delay, i was away and/or busy. :-(

Here follow a small summary for libtool HEAD on my Tru64 v5.1B
workstation.

bootstrap works (very slowly, but it works ...).

* Without modification, configure works fine but make abort with
  `./config.status: print: not found' error message.

* With `BIN_SH=xpg4; export BIN_SH' set before configuring and
  building both configure and make work. `make check' report 4
  failures (verbose run attached for the 1st one):
   FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
   FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
   FAIL: tests/mdemo-dryrun.test
   FAIL: tests/mdemo-make.test
  NB: I'm getting the same results with the patch i previoulsy posted,
  which swap `print -r' and `ksh' tests in _LT_PROG_ECHO_BACKSLASH
  macro.

* With `lt_ECHO='printf %s\\n'; export lt_ECHO' set, configure
  generate numerous `sed: Function 1s/^X//\n cannot be parsed'
  messages.

Regards.

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.
gmake  check-recursive
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool'
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool'
gmake  check-TESTS check-local
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool'
mdemo-static.test: ===  Running mdemo-static.test
mdemo-static.test: ===  Running `gmake distclean' in mdemo
gmake[4]: Entering directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo'
 rm -f mdemo mdemo
 rm -f mdemo_static mdemo_static
test -z libsub.la foo1.la libfoo2.la libmlib.la || rm -f libsub.la foo1.la 
libfoo2.la libmlib.la
rm -f ./so_locations
rm -f ./so_locations
rm -f ./so_locations
rm -f ./so_locations
rm -rf .libs _libs
rm -f *.o
rm -f *.lo
rm -f *.tab.c
test -z  || rm -f 
rm -f libtool
rm -f TAGS ID GTAGS GRTAGS GSYMS GPATH tags
rm -f config.status config.cache config.log configure.lineno 
configure.status.lineno
rm -f Makefile
gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo'
mdemo-static.test: ===  Configuring in mdemo
mdemo-static.test: ===  /bin/sh /home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo/configure 
--srcdir=/home/njoly/temp/libtool/tests/mdemo 
--prefix=/home/njoly/temp/libtool/_inst
checking for a BSD-compatible install... ../../libltdl/config/install-sh -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... nawk
checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables... 
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... no
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking for style of include used by gmake... GNU
checking dependency style of cc... tru64
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking build system type... alphaev56-dec-osf5.1b
checking host system type... alphaev56-dec-osf5.1b
checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep
checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E
checking for fgrep... /usr/bin/grep -F
checking for non-GNU ld... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... no
checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 16384
checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all
checking for ar... ar
checking for strip... strip
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from cc object... ok
checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking for shl_load... no
checking for shl_load in -ldld... no
checking for dlopen... yes
checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes
checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... yes
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for cc option to produce PIC...  -DPIC
checking if cc PIC flag  -DPIC works... yes
checking if cc static flag -non_shared works... yes
checking if cc 

Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-10 Thread Albert Chin
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 11:34:13AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Albert Chin wrote:
 
 |05:00 PM dogbert ~$PS1='$ ' /bin/sh
 |$ echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
 |X,,: not found
 |$ sed: Function 1s, cannot be parsed.
 |
 |
 | What system is this? Works fine on 4.0D and 5.1.
 |
 
 I don't think you tried /bin/sh. Works okay with zsh or even with
 /usr/bin/posix/sh though.

Ah, you're right. /usr/bin/posix/sh == /bin/ksh.

-- 
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Albert Chin wrote:

|05:00 PM dogbert ~$PS1='$ ' /bin/sh
|$ echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
|X,,: not found
|$ sed: Function 1s, cannot be parsed.
|
|
| What system is this? Works fine on 4.0D and 5.1.
|

I don't think you tried /bin/sh. Works okay with zsh or even with
/usr/bin/posix/sh though.

Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBQtCJJbiDAg3OZTLPAQLV4AQAocdPaECwoB261oWvd44dJhmQ2X4SMpzY
lWAH1Rj+Dzt9CrFEsdqPWTMzQr1SZKHWp7Wiie1or32bCaiOYGmBmQT8tpPBKG5t
sB7arPqY9IIMLU9S42t6JJ1P4V7n5kqXfkrrNT7n0A85Wldmr7KkB5mXD6nE/wk3
f280fAEb9Z0=
=SReQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-08 Thread Albert Chin
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 05:02:26PM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
 In regard to: Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool...:
 
 * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST:
 
 This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
 on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
 next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.
 
 Stupid question:  Does Tru64 sh need `^' quoted?  The one Solaris one
 does.  I.e., does
  echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
 work there?  (Libtool currently does not quote this consistently.)
 
 I haven't seen any responses to this, so I will: it does need it quoted:
 
 05:00 PM dogbert ~$PS1='$ ' /bin/sh
 $ echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
 X,,: not found
 $ sed: Function 1s, cannot be parsed.

What system is this? Works fine on 4.0D and 5.1.

-- 
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-07 Thread Tim Mooney

In regard to: Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool...:


* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST:


This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.


Stupid question:  Does Tru64 sh need `^' quoted?  The one Solaris one
does.  I.e., does
 echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
work there?  (Libtool currently does not quote this consistently.)


I haven't seen any responses to this, so I will: it does need it quoted:

05:00 PM dogbert ~$PS1='$ ' /bin/sh
$ echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
X,,: not found
$ sed: Function 1s, cannot be parsed.

$ exit


Tim
--
Tim Mooney  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building  (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST:
 
 This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
 on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
 next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.

Stupid question:  Does Tru64 sh need `^' quoted?  The one Solaris one
does.  I.e., does
  echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
work there?  (Libtool currently does not quote this consistently.)

Regards,
Ralf




Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-07-06 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:11AM CEST:
 
 This is a gentle reminder that this issue with Libtool HEAD/branch-2-0
 on Tru64 sh is still unsolved.  It'd be nice to get a solution into the
 next 2.0 release candidate, should such a solution exist.

Stupid question:  Does Tru64 sh need `^' quoted?  The one Solaris one
does.  I.e., does
  echo Xbla | sed 1s,^X,,
work there?  (Libtool currently does not quote this consistently.)

Regards,
Ralf


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 * Nicolas Joly wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:00:16PM CEST:
  On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 10:37:27AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
   * Nicolas Joly wrote on Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:02:32AM CEST:
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 06:22:37PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 
 OK to apply this patch to branch-2-0 and HEAD, and then backport to
 branch-1-5?
 
  Ok, with the patch applied, both libtool-1.5.18 and branch-1-5 are
  fine: All 112 tests passed.
 
 Applied the first patch below to HEAD, branch-2-0, the second to
 branch-1-5.

Thanks a lot.

Unfortunately, i was unable to bootstrap libtool HEAD on my Tru64 unix
workstation. Next step was to bootstrap it on another machine
(NetBSD/amd64); back to the Tru64 machine ... another failure.
   
   that just helped us find more HEAD bug(s).  :-/
   
   First, could you post the exact output of `bootstrap' on Tru64?
  
  I must have done something weird; `./boostrap' now works ... and
  `./configure' too. But print problems arise with the make command :
 
 Since this is not fixed yet, here's at least a workaround: specify
 either one (or both) of CONFIG_SHELL and ECHO resp. lt_ECHO (branch-1-5
 resp. branch-2-0/HEAD) while configuring.  CONFIG_SHELL needs to be done
 like so:
 
   CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/foosh /bin/foosh path/to/configure [OPTIONS..]
 
 and you should provide an echo which does not interpret backslashes
 (one of `echo', `/bin/echo', `print -r', `printf %s\\n' should usually
 do).

In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh'
tests are swapped (attached patch). It seems to go a little further
(no more `print' error messages), but seems to fail in another ksh
problem/bug :

[...]
libtool: compile:  cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=config.h -DLTDL -I. -I. -I.. -I. -I. 
-I./libltdl -g -c -MD loaders/dlopen.c -o dlopen.o /dev/null 21
/bin/ksh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link cc  -g -module -avoid-version  -o 
dlopen.la  dlopen.lo  
../libtool[24]: invalid multibyte character
../libtool[6]: invalid multibyte character
../libtool[2312]: invalid multibyte character
libtool: link: invalid operation mode `link'
libtool: link: Try `libtool --help --mode=link' for more information.
../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
[...]
../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
gmake[3]: *** [dlopen.la] Segmentation fault
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool/libltdl'
gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST:
 On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
  
CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/foosh /bin/foosh path/to/configure [OPTIONS..]
  
  and you should provide an echo which does not interpret backslashes
  (one of `echo', `/bin/echo', `print -r', `printf %s\\n' should usually
  do).
 
 In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh'
 tests are swapped (attached patch). It seems to go a little further
 (no more `print' error messages), but seems to fail in another ksh
 problem/bug :

Please rerun the libtool command line with --debug and post output,
you may pack (gzip, bzip2).

Regards,
Ralf

 [...]
 libtool: compile:  cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H=config.h -DLTDL -I. -I. -I.. -I. 
 -I. -I./libltdl -g -c -MD loaders/dlopen.c -o dlopen.o /dev/null 21
 /bin/ksh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link cc  -g -module -avoid-version  -o 
 dlopen.la  dlopen.lo  
 ../libtool[24]: invalid multibyte character
 ../libtool[6]: invalid multibyte character
 ../libtool[2312]: invalid multibyte character
 libtool: link: invalid operation mode `link'
 libtool: link: Try `libtool --help --mode=link' for more information.
 ../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
 ../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
 ../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
 [...]
 ../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
 ../libtool[7679]: invalid multibyte character
 gmake[3]: *** [dlopen.la] Segmentation fault
 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/njoly/temp/libtool/libltdl'
 gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST:
  On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
   
 CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/foosh /bin/foosh path/to/configure [OPTIONS..]
   
   and you should provide an echo which does not interpret backslashes
   (one of `echo', `/bin/echo', `print -r', `printf %s\\n' should usually
   do).
  
  In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh'
  tests are swapped (attached patch). It seems to go a little further
  (no more `print' error messages), but seems to fail in another ksh
  problem/bug :
 
 Please rerun the libtool command line with --debug and post output,
 you may pack (gzip, bzip2).

libtool.dbg.bz2 attached.

Regards.

NB: Attached the patch forgotten in previous email too :-(

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.


libtool.dbg.bz2
Description: Binary data
Index: m4/libtool.m4
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/m4/libtool.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.194
diff -u -r1.194 libtool.m4
--- m4/libtool.m4   6 Jun 2005 16:12:53 -   1.194
+++ m4/libtool.m4   7 Jun 2005 09:41:26 -
@@ -818,19 +818,19 @@
 
 if test X$ECHO = Xecho; then
   # We didn't find a better echo, so look for alternatives.
-  if test X`{ print -r '\t'; } 2/dev/null` = 'X\t' 
- echo_testing_string=`{ print -r $echo_test_string; } 2/dev/null` 
- test X$echo_testing_string = X$echo_test_string; then
-# This shell has a builtin print -r that does the trick.
-ECHO='print -r'
-  elif { test -f /bin/ksh || test -f /bin/ksh$ac_exeext; } 
-  test X$CONFIG_SHELL != X/bin/ksh; then
+  if { test -f /bin/ksh || test -f /bin/ksh$ac_exeext; } 
+ test X$CONFIG_SHELL != X/bin/ksh; then
 # If we have ksh, try running configure again with it.
 ORIGINAL_CONFIG_SHELL=${CONFIG_SHELL-/bin/sh}
 export ORIGINAL_CONFIG_SHELL
 CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/ksh
 export CONFIG_SHELL
 exec $CONFIG_SHELL [$]0 --no-reexec ${1+[$]@}
+  elif test X`{ print -r '\t'; } 2/dev/null` = 'X\t' 
+ echo_testing_string=`{ print -r $echo_test_string; } 2/dev/null` 
+ test X$echo_testing_string = X$echo_test_string; then
+# This shell has a builtin print -r that does the trick.
+ECHO='print -r'
   else
 # Try using printf.
 ECHO='printf %s\n'
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:27:25PM CEST:
 On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
  * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST:
   
   In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh'
   tests are swapped (attached patch). It seems to go a little further
   (no more `print' error messages), but seems to fail in another ksh
   problem/bug :

[ which ends in a segmentation fault. ]

  Please rerun the libtool command line with --debug and post output,
  you may pack (gzip, bzip2).
 
 libtool.dbg.bz2 attached.

OK, let's cut this testing a little short.  It seems that Tru64 fails to
provide any decent kind of shell for its users.

I consider just putting a note about Tru64 into README (branch-1-5)
resp. doc/notes.texi (HEAD).   Proposal would be one of the following
(whichever works and passes the test suite):

| Note that Tru64 V5.1B ksh has some bugs which make it hardly useable for
| libtoolized packages.  Please set
|   BIN_SH=xpg4; export BIN_SH
| in your environment for configuring and building.

| Note that Tru64 V5.1B ksh has some bugs which make it hardly useable for
| libtoolized packages.  Please set
|   lt_ECHO='printf %s\\n'; export lt_ECHO
| in your environment for configuring and building.

(s/lt_ECHO/ECHO/g for branch-1-5).

What do you think?  Which one?  Could one of the Tru64 users be bothered
to send a bug report to HP?

Regards, and thanks for all your testing,
Ralf


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool


Re: FYI: ksh bug on Tru64 UNIX causes current libtool failure

2005-06-07 Thread Nicolas Joly
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:31:22PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
 * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:27:25PM CEST:
  On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:35:00PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
   * Nicolas Joly wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:10:47PM CEST:

In the mean time, i tested the solution where `print -r' and `ksh'
tests are swapped (attached patch). It seems to go a little further
(no more `print' error messages), but seems to fail in another ksh
problem/bug :
 
 [ which ends in a segmentation fault. ]
 
   Please rerun the libtool command line with --debug and post output,
   you may pack (gzip, bzip2).
  
  libtool.dbg.bz2 attached.
 
 OK, let's cut this testing a little short.  It seems that Tru64 fails to
 provide any decent kind of shell for its users.
 
 I consider just putting a note about Tru64 into README (branch-1-5)
 resp. doc/notes.texi (HEAD).   Proposal would be one of the following
 (whichever works and passes the test suite):
 
 | Note that Tru64 V5.1B ksh has some bugs which make it hardly useable for
 | libtoolized packages.  Please set
 |   BIN_SH=xpg4; export BIN_SH
 | in your environment for configuring and building.

This one does not work ... It will solve the `print' problem, but will
lead to the shell crash a little later.

with `BIN_SH=xpg4' set, `/usr/bin/posix/sh' is executed instead of the
classic `/bin/sh'; and, unfortunately, this is a hard link to `ksh'.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] ls -ldi /usr/bin/posix/sh /usr/bin/ksh 
  482 -rwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin   307248 Oct 16  2002 /usr/bin/ksh
  482 -rwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin   307248 Oct 16  2002 /usr/bin/posix/sh

 | Note that Tru64 V5.1B ksh has some bugs which make it hardly useable for
 | libtoolized packages.  Please set
 |   lt_ECHO='printf %s\\n'; export lt_ECHO
 | in your environment for configuring and building.
 
 (s/lt_ECHO/ECHO/g for branch-1-5).

Will test, and report.

 What do you think?  Which one?  Could one of the Tru64 users be bothered
 to send a bug report to HP?

Sorry i can't.

Our sysadmins tried to have a software support contract from
Digital/Compaq for many years, but didn't get any succes ! They give
up when HP came up ...

-- 
Nicolas Joly

Biological Software and Databanks.
Institut Pasteur, Paris.


___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool