Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Libusb-devel] libusb is dead - long live libusbx!

2012-04-23 Thread Tim Roberts
Jose Pablo wrote: I think Vincent is right. I am pretty sure you guys have a lot of good ideas for the library but if you keep that attitude you will not get it serious. It seen you guys are taking the project by force I think that's the intent, yes. -- Tim Roberts, t...@probo.com

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Libusb-devel] libusb is dead - long live libusbx!

2012-04-23 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, On 04/23/2012 07:31 PM, Garret Kelly wrote: Then we should begin actively discussing this issue with the people who it _is_ up to. Preferably who're going to be doing the distro packaging, because they're going to

Re: [Libusbx-devel] [Libusb-devel] libusb is dead - long live libusbx!

2012-04-23 Thread Pete Batard
On 2012.04.23 18:31, Garret Kelly wrote: I'll agree with you that end-users and developers may prefer a fork of a given project, but many modern distributions offer both sides of a forked package, and even multiple versions of the forked packages in the case of the JRE. Additionally,_because_