On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 03:50 -0600, Sreerenj wrote:
> On 14.05.2014 10:51, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 07:34 +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> >> 2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
> >>> On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 20
On 14.05.2014 10:51, Xiang, Haihao wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 07:34 +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Hi,
2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Fen
Hi,
2014-05-14 10:01 GMT+02:00 Xiang, Haihao :
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 15:49 +0800, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
>> On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 23:34 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
>> > 2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
>> > > On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 15:49 +0800, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 23:34 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > 2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
> > > On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> 2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
> > >>
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 07:34 +0200, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> 2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
> > On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
> >> > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Feng wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 23:34 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> 2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
> > On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
> >> > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Feng wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
>
2014-05-12 7:29 GMT+02:00 Zhao, Yakui :
> On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
>> > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Feng wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> >>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - Wi
On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 22:41 -0600, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
> > On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Feng wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> >>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With this
> >> >>> information I could resync with
Hi,
2014-05-12 3:34 GMT+02:00 Zhao Yakui :
> On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Feng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> >>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With this
>> >>> information I could resync without an IDR by carefully selecting the
>> >>> reference frame(s).
>> >
>> >> W
Hi,
>>
>> >>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With
>> >>> this information I could resync without an IDR by carefully
>> >>> selecting the reference frame(s).
>> >
>> >> Will you please describe your idea in detail?
>> >
>> >>> long term references would typically be emp
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 03:06 -0600, Yuan, Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With this
> >>> information I could resync without an IDR by carefully selecting the
> >>> reference frame(s).
> >
> >> Will you please describe your idea in detail?
> >
> >
Hi,
2014-05-09 11:06 GMT+02:00 Yuan, Feng :
> Hi,
>
I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With this
information I could resync without an IDR by carefully selecting the
reference frame(s).
>>
>>> Will you please describe your idea in detail?
>>
long term ref
Hi,
>>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With this
>>> information I could resync without an IDR by carefully selecting the
>>> reference frame(s).
>
>> Will you please describe your idea in detail?
>
>>> long term references would typically be employed as well, but it
>>>
Hi,
>> I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With
>> this information I could resync without an IDR by carefully
>> selecting the reference frame(s).
> Will you please describe your idea in detail?
>> long term references would typically be employed as well, but it
>> seems r
On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 12:32 -0600, Torbjorn Tyridal wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is it possible to select which reference frames to consider when
> encoding a frame with libva (Intel, haswell)?
>
The upper user-space application will pass the reference picture list0/1
for H264 encoding and then the libv
Hi,
Is it possible to select which reference frames to consider when encoding a
frame with libva (Intel, haswell)?
I have a scheme where the decoder ack's received frames - With this
information I could resync without an IDR by carefully selecting the
reference frame(s).
long term references wo
16 matches
Mail list logo