On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Fabian Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hey,
I'm using KVM with the wonderful help of libvir (virsh), on a
to-be-production-ready server of mine.
I would like to be able to choose on a way or another the ip of each
of my VM. As far as I can
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Tóth István wrote:
Hello!
Welcome back :-)
This patch contains the following:
- The complete storage handling API
- Fixing memory leaks in the VirConnect JNI implementation
Very cool !
I've written the new classes using a new approach.
Hi All,
I would like to know if it's possible to configure in the network XML file
more option than DHCP range like default gateway, static route, dns and so
on...
I fact I need to set up a complex virtual network with 3 DMZ and I would
really appreciate to did it with virt-manager.
Thank for
lør, 02 08 2008 kl. 23:13 +0200, skrev Olivier Deckmyn:
I would like to be able to choose on a way or another the ip of each
of my VM. As far as I can understand, the only way to get an IP (from
a vm point of view) if the dhcp it. But I have no garantee vm1 will
always get x.x.x.1 Ip adress...
Stefan de Konink wrote:
At what time are volumes currently detected on NetFS? I see there is
some sort of storage now going on, since deleting files from NFS doesn't
delete them from vol-list directly. (If this is fixed in a recent
version... I'm sorry to bother)
I haven't scoured the
Hi,
This patch fixes syntax error(found TAB(s))
http://builder.virt-manager.org/module-libvirt--devel.html
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
fix_typo20080804.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 05:56 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Tóth István wrote:
Hello!
Welcome back :-)
This patch contains the following:
- The complete storage handling API
- Fixing memory leaks in the VirConnect JNI implementation
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 07:46:05AM +0200, Toth Istvan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 05:56 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
How is it smaller code ?
Actually, that's not the new-style code, It's just the bugfixed one. I
have not converted that file yet.
heh, okay :-)
To see the new style
