On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:57:55PM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
Now, all of that said, it is actually possible to hot-add a second
scsi device. However, as far as I can tell, this method is not yet
supported by libvirt. It looks to me that with modern qemu, you have
to do it this way:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:04:29PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Would someone help me have a shrink-wrapped solution for obtaining libvirt
events in python?
I decided to re-write the demo program so that is shows a serious
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:04:29PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Would someone help me have a shrink-wrapped solution for obtaining libvirt
events in python?
def virEventUpdateTimerImpl(timerID, interval):
global eventLopo
Small typo here: eventLopo instead of eventLoop.
Florian
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:04:29PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Would someone help me have a shrink-wrapped solution for obtaining libvirt
events in python?
These patches are a re-post of Jonas Eriksson's work from a couple of months
ago, that we mistakenly forgot to commit.
The first patch is unchanged, apart from being adjusted for new source code
layout. The second patch is changed so that it checks against the hypervisor,
not Xend, since using
From: Jonas Eriksson jonas.j.eriks...@ericsson.com
The xenUnifiedNumOfDomains and xenUnifiedListDomains methods work
together as a pair, so it is critical they both apply the same
logic. With the current mis-matched logic it is possible to sometimes
get into a state when you miss certain active
The xenstore database sometimes has stale domain IDs which are not
present in the hypervisor anymore. Filter these out to avoid causing
confusion
* src/xen/xs_internal.c: Filter domain IDs against HV's list
* src/xen/xen_hypervisor.h, src/xen/xen_hypervisor.c: Add new
xenHypervisorHasDomain()
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:59:47AM +0200, Thomas Treutner wrote:
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 11:38:31 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
What is the output of 'xenstore-ls' on each host machine at this time ?
http://tt.scripty.at/tmp/node01-xenstore-ls.txt.gz
The problem, that I post here
http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list@redhat.com/msg16154.html
and that was solved, comes back in a different way.
Consider a working kvm machine with the following description:
...
os
type arch='x86_64' machine='pc'hvm/type
boot dev='hd'/
/os
...
If
Speaking from an x86 angle,providing an ability to enable or disable
high level constructs like SSE instead of low level constructs, will
make it easy to understand.
Thanks
Mukesh
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:19:47AM
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:35:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
From: Jonas Eriksson jonas.j.eriks...@ericsson.com
The xenUnifiedNumOfDomains and xenUnifiedListDomains methods work
together as a pair, so it is critical they both apply the same
logic. With the current mis-matched logic it
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:35:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The xenstore database sometimes has stale domain IDs which are not
present in the hypervisor anymore. Filter these out to avoid causing
confusion
* src/xen/xs_internal.c: Filter domain IDs against HV's list
*
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:23:44PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The original mail i tried to send was far too large, so here's it
edited to remove the boring bits.
Daniel
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
To: libvir-list@redhat.com
Cc: Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 12:44:47PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This series is an update of
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00540.html
There isn't as much functional change here as you might presume
from the number of patches. Since Chris' tunnelled
On Friday 09 October 2009 11:35:47 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
These patches are a re-post of Jonas Eriksson's work from a couple of
months ago, that we mistakenly forgot to commit.
The first patch is unchanged, apart from being adjusted for new source code
layout. The second patch is changed
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:04:29PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Would someone help me
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 07:04:29PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Would someone help me
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:01:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 10:19:08AM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:59:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at
I would like some advice on how to proceed with this bug, and where
the solution lies...in qemu or in libvirt. Ultimately, I would like
the behavior we had in our previous release with kvm-84 and
libvirt-0.6.1, where we could dynamically add scsi devices without a
problem, using:
pci_add 1
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
I would like some advice on how to proceed with this bug, and where
the solution lies...in qemu or in libvirt. Ultimately, I would like
the behavior we had in our previous release with kvm-84 and
libvirt-0.6.1, where
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:57:55PM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
Now, all of that said, it is actually possible to hot-add a second
scsi device. However, as far as I can tell, this method is not yet
supported by
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 05:26:07PM +0200, Wolfgang Mauerer wrote:
Hi,
Hi Wolfgang,
this patch reworks libvirt's disk-hotadd support and
introduces support for disk controller hotplugging and disk-hotremove
(see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.libvirt/15860 for
more
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 05:06:46PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 03:29:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I think it would be nice to get back on an end-of-the-month release
schedule. It was nice to have predictability that the date was approx
the 30/31st of the
On 10/05/2009 04:48 PM, Thomas Treutner wrote:
On Monday 05 October 2009 14:43:05 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:59:27PM +0200, Thomas Treutner wrote:
Hi list,
I was wondering about the status of this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512367
I have been looking into registering some domain events though the
python Libvir API. However, I am getting errors and I believe it may
be due to lack of event support in Xen. This is the error I am getting:
libvir: Xen error : this function is not supported by the hypervisor:
26 matches
Mail list logo
