On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:17:51AM -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 11/6/18 12:10 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > But HOST records can have the same hostname for multiple records
> > (similar to TXT records with the same value). The value that
> > needs to be distinct for H
I've filed [1] to track this in Bugzilla.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647211
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
--
libvir-list mailing list
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 09:10:39AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:
> This commit update the matching logic to only consider the IP
> address.
Oops, I should have updated the subject to:
virNetworkDefUpdateDNSHost: Only require IP to match
Cheers,
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or enc
Anything I can do to help this along? I've adjusted the subject to
have "PATCH go" instead of just "PATCH"; sorry about that.
Cheers,
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
Since fc19a0059 (network: backend functions for updating network dns
host/srv/txt, 2012-11-12), the matching logic for various network
components has been:
1) for HOST records, it's considered a match if the IP address or any
of the hostnames of an existing record matches.
2) for SRV records,
Make it easier to convert version integers to the more human-readable
major.minor.release format.
---
connect.go | 8
version.go | 52 ++
version_test.go | 64 +
3 files
