On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:02:21PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
sorry for the delay. Here's the newest version of the patch which
should address all the issues that have been raised so far.
Yes no. It didn't address the redundant re-ordering of -drive
parameters when using boot=on,
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 09:38:26AM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
Yes and no. In the latest patch I provided I only set use_extboot if
there's only one boot device defined, and it's a virtio device, so PXE
booting would use the old-style -boot n syntax. I literallly woke up
this morning and
Hi,
sorry for the delay. Here's the newest version of the patch which should
address all the issues that have been raised so far.
=== modified file 'src/qemu_conf.c'
--- old/src/qemu_conf.c 2008-04-30 12:30:55 +
+++ new/src/qemu_conf.c 2008-05-06 17:58:44 +
@@ -491,6 +491,8 @@
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:11:11PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
sorry for the delay. Here's the newest version of the patch which should
address all the issues that have been raised so far.
Yes no. It didn't address the redundant re-ordering of -drive parameters
when using boot=on, nor re-add
Hi!
I'd like to propose that the following patch gets applied against
libvirt. It adds the option of putting a bus attribute on a disk target.
To acommodate this, it also changes the way drives are defined for kvm
from the old -hda /path/to/file -boot c style to the new -drive
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:56:13AM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to propose that the following patch gets applied against
libvirt. It adds the option of putting a bus attribute on a disk target.
To acommodate this, it also changes the way drives are defined for kvm
from the old
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+strcmp((const char *)target, hdd)
+strcmp((const char *)target, hdd)
These two lines test the same thing !
Quite so. My bad.
+strncmp((const char *)target, vd, 2)) {
Its probably a better
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+if (!bus)
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if (!strcmp((const char *)bus, ide))
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+if (!bus)
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if (!strcmp((const char *)bus, ide))
+
Jim Meyering [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:10:40PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 02:27:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+if (!bus)
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+if (!bus)
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if (!strcmp((const char *)bus, ide))
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if (!strcmp((const char *)bus, scsi))
+disk-bus =
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Soren Hansen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:17:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
+if (!bus)
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if (!strcmp((const char *)bus, ide))
+disk-bus = QEMUD_DISK_BUS_IDE;
+else if
12 matches
Mail list logo
