Re: [PATCH 0/3] batch: don't require checking retvalue of some bitmap ops

2020-08-13 Thread Nikolay Shirokovskiy
On 30.07.2020 18:49, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > > > On 30.07.2020 17:56, Peter Krempa wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 17:27:35 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: >>> Most of bitmap setBit/clearBit/getBit users know that the bitmap index is >>> not out of bound and thus don't check the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] batch: don't require checking retvalue of some bitmap ops

2020-07-30 Thread Nikolay Shirokovskiy
On 30.07.2020 17:56, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 17:27:35 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: >> Most of bitmap setBit/clearBit/getBit users know that the bitmap index is >> not out of bound and thus don't check the return value. More precisely >> the stats is next: >> >>

Re: [PATCH 0/3] batch: don't require checking retvalue of some bitmap ops

2020-07-30 Thread Peter Krempa
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 17:27:35 +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > Most of bitmap setBit/clearBit/getBit users know that the bitmap index is > not out of bound and thus don't check the return value. More precisely > the stats is next: > > Methodall check >

[PATCH 0/3] batch: don't require checking retvalue of some bitmap ops

2020-07-30 Thread Nikolay Shirokovskiy
Most of bitmap setBit/clearBit/getBit users know that the bitmap index is not out of bound and thus don't check the return value. More precisely the stats is next: Methodall check === virBitmapSetBit85 14 virBitmapClearBit 15