On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:16:51 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Our own coding style suggest not inventing new names for labels
> and stick with 'cleanup' (when the path is used in both,
> successful and unsuccessful returns), or 'error' (when the code
> below the label is used only upon error).
Our own coding style suggest not inventing new names for labels
and stick with 'cleanup' (when the path is used in both,
successful and unsuccessful returns), or 'error' (when the code
below the label is used only upon error). Well, 'failed' label
falls into the latter category. Rename it then.
