On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 10:57:23 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:47:04AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 15.09.21 11:45, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > > On 24.08.21 16:44, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > > The qemu driver didn't ever implement any
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:47:04AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 15.09.21 11:45, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > On 24.08.21 16:44, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > The qemu driver didn't ever implement any meaningful handling for the
> > > 'preserve' action.
> > >
> > > Forbid the
On 15.09.21 11:45, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 24.08.21 16:44, Peter Krempa wrote:
The qemu driver didn't ever implement any meaningful handling for the
'preserve' action.
Forbid the flag in the qemu def validator and update the documentation
to be factual.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
On 24.08.21 16:44, Peter Krempa wrote:
The qemu driver didn't ever implement any meaningful handling for the
'preserve' action.
Forbid the flag in the qemu def validator and update the documentation
to be factual.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
NACK. It is a perfectly sane usecase to have
The qemu driver didn't ever implement any meaningful handling for the
'preserve' action.
Forbid the flag in the qemu def validator and update the documentation
to be factual.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa
---
docs/formatdomain.rst| 3 +--
src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 10 ++
2 files