Re: [libvirt] [PATCH: 0/MANY] Re-arrange files in the source tree

[ Sending again since my outgoing mail was down yesterday :-( ] On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: This is a followup to http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches,

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH: 0/MANY] Re-arrange files in the source tree

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: This is a followup to http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches, since it'd generate a HUGE series of mails. Instead I have

[libvirt] [PATCH: 0/MANY] Re-arrange files in the source tree

This is a followup to http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches, since it'd generate a HUGE series of mails. Instead I have published a branch containing all the patches which you can directly pull

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH: 0/MANY] Re-arrange files in the source tree

2009/9/16 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com: This is a followup to  http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-September/msg00477.html I am not actually going to spam the list with all the patches, since it'd generate a HUGE series of mails. Instead I have published a branch