On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:58:12PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Fine by me, my only worry is that we are somehow breaking the storage XML
format as a result, but I don't think this is widely used at this point
(at least with MSDos) and best done earlier than later,
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically s/dos/msdos/
Hi Cole,
This definitely needs to be fixed.
FYI, dos
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:01:16AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically s/dos/msdos/
Hi Cole,
This definitely needs to be fixed.
FYI, dos appears to be the preferred name for that partition table type
(google for partition table and
Jim Meyering wrote:
Cole Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically s/dos/msdos/
Hi Cole,
This definitely needs to be fixed.
FYI, dos appears to be the preferred name for that partition table type
(google
parted doesn't seem to want the label 'dos', instead
wanting 'msdos'. Patch is basically s/dos/msdos/
Thanks,
Cole
diff --git a/docs/storage.html.in b/docs/storage.html.in
index 40e8e80..8cab480 100644
--- a/docs/storage.html.in
+++ b/docs/storage.html.in
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ libvirt.
/p
