Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Increase default file handle limits for daemons

2017-03-16 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 07:34:04PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:55:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes > > scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large > > hosts which

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Increase default file handle limits for daemons

2017-03-15 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:55:04PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes > scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large > hosts which might want > 1024 guest to be running. In fact if each > guest needs > 1

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] Increase default file handle limits for daemons

2017-03-15 Thread Laine Stump
On 03/15/2017 12:55 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes > scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large > hosts which might want > 1024 guest to be running. In fact if each > guest needs > 1 FD, we can't even get to

[libvirt] [PATCH] Increase default file handle limits for daemons

2017-03-15 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Linux still defaults to a 1024 open file handle limit. This causes scalability problems for libvirtd / virtlockd / virtlogd on large hosts which might want > 1024 guest to be running. In fact if each guest needs > 1 FD, we can't even get to 500 guests. This is not good enough when we see machines