On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:23:46PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
> > consensus based community. Formally document what has
> > always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
> > par
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:56:12AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:30:24PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
> > consensus based community. Formally document what has
> > always been an unwritten assumption amon
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:30:24PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
> consensus based community. Formally document what has
> always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
> participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:30:24PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
> consensus based community. Formally document what has
> always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
> participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct
On 02/03/2014 11:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
> consensus based community. Formally document what has
> always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
> participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct
> to prempt any po
The project has historically operated as a meritocratic
consensus based community. Formally document what has
always been an unwritten assumption amongst the community
participants. Also include an explicit code of conduct
to prempt any potential, but unlikely, future problems.
Signed-off-by: Dani
