On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 21:15 -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm reverting the patch under the build-breaker rules, while trying to
> reproduce the cross-compilation locally rather than relying solely on
> CI. My local testing that proved that #pragma push_macro works with gcc
> was obviously not
On 8/7/19 9:59 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 7/31/19 9:30 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Commit fed58d83 was a hack to fix a mingw build failure due to header
>> inclusion order resulting in a clash over the use of DATADIR, by
>> repeating a trick made several other times in the past of tweaking
>>
On 7/31/19 9:30 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Commit fed58d83 was a hack to fix a mingw build failure due to header
inclusion order resulting in a clash over the use of DATADIR, by
repeating a trick made several other times in the past of tweaking
inclusion order until it goes away. Better is to revert
On 7/31/19 2:30 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit fed58d83 was a hack to fix a mingw build failure due to header
> inclusion order resulting in a clash over the use of DATADIR, by
> repeating a trick made several other times in the past of tweaking
> inclusion order until it goes away. Better is to
Commit fed58d83 was a hack to fix a mingw build failure due to header
inclusion order resulting in a clash over the use of DATADIR, by
repeating a trick made several other times in the past of tweaking
inclusion order until it goes away. Better is to revert that, and
instead use pragmas to avoid
