[Christophe, so sorry for such a late reply. I honestly missed this feedback
email, was
swamped with other stuff. Just noticed this while I got some time to revisit
this do a
v2 of this, while browsing through archives.]
On 02/22/2013 07:34 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
Hey Kashyap,
I've
Hey Kashyap,
I've started reading this to learn about libvirt snapshot implementation,
and noticed a few typos (I think Eric already pointed out some of these),
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:28:06PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
---
docs/snapshots-blockcommit-blockpull.rst | 646
+
+The above figure is another representation of reducing the disk image
chain
+using blockcommit. Data from Snap-1, Snap-2, Snap-3 are
merged(/committed)
+into RootBase, now the current 'Active' image now pointing to
'RootBase' as its
+backing file(instead of Snap-3, which was the
On 01/26/2013 05:34 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:55 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Eric,
I wonder if you still have some time to take a look at this.
Thanks for the reminder. And sorry that I lost your original email when
my disk crashed last November; this ping makes it easier
On 01/23/2013 01:55 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Eric,
I wonder if you still have some time to take a look at this.
Thanks for the reminder. And sorry that I lost your original email when
my disk crashed last November; this ping makes it easier for me to dig
up your message than hunting for
Eric,
I wonder if you still have some time to take a look at this.
Thanks.
On 10/23/2012 03:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
More elaborate notes on snapshots, blockpull, blockcommit. Much of this
is derived from various dicussions with Eric Blake, Jeff Cody, Kevin Wolf
(thanks a lot!)
More elaborate notes on snapshots, blockpull, blockcommit. Much of this
is derived from various dicussions with Eric Blake, Jeff Cody, Kevin Wolf
(thanks a lot!) several others on IRC and mailing lists and a lot of adhoc
testing. I didn't wanted this to get lost.
I also plan to add notes for
