On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 11:59:35AM -0400, David Lively wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 17:54 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel Veillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff --git a/src/storage_conf.c b/src/storage_conf.c
index 2f6093b..37a2040 100644
--- a/src/storage_conf.c
+++
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 03:49:27PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Hi Jim -
I've attached a (very) small incremental patch (i.e., to be applied
after the one you've already merged) that addresses a couple things I
noticed missing:
(a) documents the new source name element in
Thanks Daniel. I just merged in your changes. You seem to be missing a
small incremental change (checking the strdup return value for NULL),
attached.
Dave
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 16:17 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 03:49:27PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Hi Jim -
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:17:49AM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Oops - that was against an old base. Sorry. Here's the new one.
Also fixed a few other issues ...
Ok, this gets my vote to commit.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|:
Oops - that was against an old base. Sorry. Here's the new one.
Also fixed a few other issues ...
Dave
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 12:12 -0400, David Lively wrote:
Same patch, resubmitted after fixing allocation issue you pointed out.
Looking more closely, I notice it was leaking when
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:17:52PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Daniel B proposed having storage pool discovery return a bunch of XML
storage source elements, rather than full pool elements (which
contain target-dependent details like the local pool name and device
or mount path -- things
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 03:17:52PM -0400, David Lively wrote:
Hi Folks -
This small patch is a proposed prerequisite for the storage pool
discovery patch I submitted last week.
Daniel B proposed having storage pool discovery return a bunch of XML
storage source elements, rather than
Hi Folks -
This small patch is a proposed prerequisite for the storage pool
discovery patch I submitted last week.
Daniel B proposed having storage pool discovery return a bunch of XML
storage source elements, rather than full pool elements (which
contain target-dependent details like the
