On 11/28/2012 05:55 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 11/28/2012 04:19 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 11/28/2012 06:08 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879473
The name attribute is required for portgroup elements (yes, the RNG
specifies that), and
On 11/28/2012 06:08 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879473
The name attribute is required for portgroup elements (yes, the RNG
specifies that), and there is code in libvirt that assumes it is
non-null. Unfortunately, the portgroup parsing
On 11/28/2012 04:19 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On 11/28/2012 06:08 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879473
The name attribute is required for portgroup elements (yes, the RNG
specifies that), and there is code in libvirt that assumes it is
This resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879473
The name attribute is required for portgroup elements (yes, the RNG
specifies that), and there is code in libvirt that assumes it is
non-null. Unfortunately, the portgroup parsing function wasn't
checking for lack of portgroup.