Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] nwfilter: allow for different format of IPv6 netmask/prefix in ebtables output

2019-02-22 Thread Laine Stump
On 2/21/19 1:02 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:21:50PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: The iptables-ebtables package is meant as a drop-in replacement for the native ebtables package, but it formats some items in the -L output differently, leading to failure of scripts that

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] nwfilter: allow for different format of IPv6 netmask/prefix in ebtables output

2019-02-22 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:21:50PM -0500, Laine Stump wrote: > The iptables-ebtables package is meant as a drop-in replacement for > the native ebtables package, but it formats some items in the -L > output differently, leading to failure of scripts that depend on the > output of ebtables -L. In

[libvirt] [PATCH] nwfilter: allow for different format of IPv6 netmask/prefix in ebtables output

2019-02-15 Thread Laine Stump
The iptables-ebtables package is meant as a drop-in replacement for the native ebtables package, but it formats some items in the -L output differently, leading to failure of scripts that depend on the output of ebtables -L. In particular: with old ebtables IPv6 prefixes are output as a netmask