On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:36:00PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
If one calls update-device with information that is not updatable,
libvirt reports success even though no data were updated. The example
used in the bug linked below uses updating device with boot order='2'/
which, in my
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 09:00:14AM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 06:36:00PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
If one calls update-device with information that is not updatable,
libvirt reports success even though no data were updated. The example
used in the bug linked below
If one calls update-device with information that is not updatable,
libvirt reports success even though no data were updated. The example
used in the bug linked below uses updating device with boot order='2'/
which, in my opinion, is a valid thing to request from user's
perspective. Mainly since
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 18:36:00 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
If one calls update-device with information that is not updatable,
libvirt reports success even though no data were updated. The example
used in the bug linked below uses updating device with boot order='2'/
which, in my
