On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 02:14:58PM +0530, Shivaprasad bhat wrote:
Hi Martin,
I see, the memory from the node specified in numatune is used correctly.
Wit your change memory-backend-file is used to enforce that
But, I see the migrations from old versions(my case, 1.2.5) seems to fail
as there
Hi Martin,
I see, the memory from the node specified in numatune is used correctly.
Wit your change memory-backend-file is used to enforce that
But, I see the migrations from old versions(my case, 1.2.5) seems to fail
as there was no backend-file before and only backend-ram.
Unknown ramblock
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 06:48:02PM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote:
We were missing a check for '!nodemask' in the condition that decides
whether we need memory-object-file or not. We only used userNodeset,
but forgot that we might need to use nodemask even if that's not set.
Even though there
We were missing a check for '!nodemask' in the condition that decides
whether we need memory-object-file or not. We only used userNodeset,
but forgot that we might need to use nodemask even if that's not set.
Even though there was a test for this, the args file was incorrect, so
it is very
