On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:27 +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> On 01/06/2016 09:49 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 09:32 +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > > diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
> > > index 2aa1d90..1354601 100644
> > > ---
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 09:32 +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
> index 2aa1d90..1354601 100644
> --- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c
> +++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
> @@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@
On 01/06/2016 09:49 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 09:32 +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/util/virstoragefile.c b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
>> index 2aa1d90..1354601 100644
>> --- a/src/util/virstoragefile.c
>> +++ b/src/util/virstoragefile.c
>> @@
If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt defaults to
port 6789; however, librbd/librados already default to 6789 when no port
number is provided.
In the future Ceph will switch to a new port for the Ceph monitors since
port 6789 is already assigned to a different application by
If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt defaults to
port 6789; however, librbd/librados already default to 6789 when no port
number is provided.
In the future Ceph will switch to a new port for the Ceph monitors since
port 6789 is already assigned to a different application by
On 01/06/2016 05:36 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt defaults to
> port 6789; however, librbd/librados already default to 6789 when no port
> number is provided.
>
> In the future Ceph will switch to a new port for the Ceph monitors since
On 06-01-16 14:55, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/2016 05:36 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt defaults to
>> port 6789; however, librbd/librados already default to 6789 when no port
>> number is provided.
>>
>> In the future Ceph
On 01/05/2016 11:36 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/28/2015 10:33 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>> If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt would default
>> to port 6789.
>>
>> librbd/librados will however already default to 6789 when no port number
>> is provided.
>
>
On 12/28/2015 10:33 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt would default
> to port 6789.
>
> librbd/librados will however already default to 6789 when no port number
> is provided.
reads better as:
If no port number was provided for a storage
If no port number was provided for a storage pool libvirt would default
to port 6789.
librbd/librados will however already default to 6789 when no port number
is provided.
In the future Ceph will however switch to a new port for the Ceph monitors
since port 6789 is already assigned to a
10 matches
Mail list logo