On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:53:29PM +0200, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
This is an ad-hoc fix for the file label generation. It uses the base context
role to determine whether to use the libvirt process context role. If this
is object_r we don't touch it.
It might be better to add a new flag to
This is an ad-hoc fix for the file label generation. It uses the base context
role to determine whether to use the libvirt process context role. If this
is object_r we don't touch it.
It might be better to add a new flag to virSecuritySELinuxGenNewContext that
specifies the context type (process
On 2012年08月17日 20:53, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
This is an ad-hoc fix for the file label generation. It uses the base context
role to determine whether to use the libvirt process context role. If this
is object_r we don't touch it.
It might be better to add a new flag to
On 08/17/2012 08:18 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年08月17日 20:53, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
This is an ad-hoc fix for the file label generation. It uses the base
context
role to determine whether to use the libvirt process context role. If
this
is object_r we don't touch it.
It might be
On 08/17/2012 04:28 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/17/2012 08:18 AM, Osier Yang wrote:
On 2012年08月17日 20:53, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
This is an ad-hoc fix for the file label generation. It uses the base
context
role to determine whether to use the libvirt process context role. If
this
is