On 2012年04月28日 17:06, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote:
It doesn't break out the for loop even if duplicate pool is
found, and thus the matchpool could be overriden as NULL again
if there is different pool afterwards.
To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
It doesn't break out the for loop even if duplicate pool is
found, and thus the matchpool could be overriden as NULL again
if there is different pool afterwards.
To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2012-April/msg00150.html
---
On 28.04.2012 10:22, Osier Yang wrote:
It doesn't break out the for loop even if duplicate pool is
found, and thus the matchpool could be overriden as NULL again
if there is different pool afterwards.
To address the problem in libvirt-user list:
