On 08/17/2018 05:40 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 08/16/2018 05:22 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/13/2018 06:49 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>>> Currently the way virStorageVolWipe() works is it looks up
>>> pool containing given volume and hold it locked throughout while
>>> API
On 08/16/2018 05:22 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/13/2018 06:49 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Currently the way virStorageVolWipe() works is it looks up
>> pool containing given volume and hold it locked throughout while
>> API execution. This is suboptimal because wiping a volume means
>>
On 08/13/2018 06:49 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Currently the way virStorageVolWipe() works is it looks up
> pool containing given volume and hold it locked throughout while
> API execution. This is suboptimal because wiping a volume means
> writing data to it which can take ages. And if the
Currently the way virStorageVolWipe() works is it looks up
pool containing given volume and hold it locked throughout while
API execution. This is suboptimal because wiping a volume means
writing data to it which can take ages. And if the whole pool is
locked during that operation no other API can