On 11/21/12 04:22, Osier Yang wrote:
Regression introduced by commit 258e06c85b7, ret could be set to 1
or 0 by virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted before goto cleanup.
This could mislead the callers (up to the public API
virStoragePoolDestroy) to return success even the underlying umount
On 2012年11月21日 21:20, Peter Krempa wrote:
On 11/21/12 04:22, Osier Yang wrote:
Regression introduced by commit 258e06c85b7, ret could be set to 1
or 0 by virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted before goto cleanup.
This could mislead the callers (up to the public API
virStoragePoolDestroy) to
Regression introduced by commit 258e06c85b7, ret could be set to 1
or 0 by virStorageBackendFileSystemIsMounted before goto cleanup.
This could mislead the callers (up to the public API
virStoragePoolDestroy) to return success even the underlying umount
command fails.
---