What is described seems reasonable; however, I'm hoping Laine could
provide some context here as to whether the change is good since he's
the original author of the change (see commit id '7a600cf7'). I've added
him to the CC list
On 02/12/2015 04:17 AM, Zhang Bo wrote:
If we assign a VF,
On 02/12/2015 04:17 AM, Zhang Bo wrote:
If we assign a VF, which has already been used by an active guest, to another
guest, and try to start the 2nd guest later on, the 2nd guest would not
start, and the VF won't work anymore.
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1 Assign a VF to guest A, and
If we assign a VF, which has already been used by an active guest, to another
guest, and try to start the 2nd guest later on, the 2nd guest would not
start, and the VF won't work anymore.
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1 Assign a VF to guest A, and start the guest. The VF works fine.
2 Assign
