On 05/04/2013 02:56 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
maybe I found a bug
Then again, maybe my old reverse midas touch is at it again and I have
found yet another bug ... that is, undesirable feature. Everything I
have found so far says that ::/0 is the same as specifying default for
IPv6 and that
On 04/29/2013 11:55 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
(I wanted a separate message to comment on this part...)
On 04/26/2013 07:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
+/* add an IP (static) route to a bridge */
+static int
+networkAddRouteToBridge(virNetworkObjPtr network,
+
On 04/26/2013 07:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
network: static route support for network
This patch adds the route subelement of network to define a static
route. the address and prefix (or netmask) attribute identify the
destination network, and the gateway attribute specifies the next hop
(I wanted a separate message to comment on this part...)
On 04/26/2013 07:22 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
+/* add an IP (static) route to a bridge */
+static int
+networkAddRouteToBridge(virNetworkObjPtr network,
+virNetworkRouteDefPtr routedef)
+{
+bool done =
network: static route support for network
This patch adds the route subelement of network to define a static
route. the address and prefix (or netmask) attribute identify the
destination network, and the gateway attribute specifies the next hop
address (which must be directly reachable from the
