All these tests fail with current GIT, but are intended to work
with Eric's snapshot series applied.
The first test in this list, however, does not pass.
Eric's current tree forbids calling 'Destroy' on a transient
guest which has snapshots present. IMHO this is wrong, because
the guest may
On 08/26/2011 08:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
All these tests fail with current GIT, but are intended to work
with Eric's snapshot series applied.
The first test in this list, however, does not pass.
Eric's current tree forbids calling 'Destroy' on a transient
guest which has snapshots
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:57:54AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/26/2011 08:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
All these tests fail with current GIT, but are intended to work
with Eric's snapshot series applied.
The first test in this list, however, does not pass.
Eric's current tree
On 08/26/2011 09:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IMHO, we should be allowed to call 'virDomainDestroy' on a
transient guest with snapshots, and then later 'virDomainCreateXML'
to re-create the guest and still have access to the snapshots
But leaving the snapshot metadata files behind is
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:15:43AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 08/26/2011 09:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
IMHO, we should be allowed to call 'virDomainDestroy' on a
transient guest with snapshots, and then later 'virDomainCreateXML'
to re-create the guest and still have access to the
