Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] wireshark: Fix $(prefix) handling

2016-10-26 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 16:54 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 26.10.2016 15:27, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > >  > > Well, almost :) There are still some cases that are not > > handled correctly, but at least this will unbreak 'make > > rpm' while I work on the rest. > >  > > Tested by running 'make

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] wireshark: Fix $(prefix) handling

2016-10-26 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 26.10.2016 15:27, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Well, almost :) There are still some cases that are not > handled correctly, but at least this will unbreak 'make > rpm' while I work on the rest. > > Tested by running 'make rpm' successfully on Fedora 23, > Fedora 24 and Fedora rawhide. > > > Andr

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] wireshark: Fix $(prefix) handling

2016-10-26 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 26.10.2016 15:27, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Well, almost :) There are still some cases that are not > handled correctly, but at least this will unbreak 'make > rpm' while I work on the rest. > > Tested by running 'make rpm' successfully on Fedora 23, > Fedora 24 and Fedora rawhide. > > > Andr

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] wireshark: Fix $(prefix) handling

2016-10-26 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Well, almost :) There are still some cases that are not handled correctly, but at least this will unbreak 'make rpm' while I work on the rest. Tested by running 'make rpm' successfully on Fedora 23, Fedora 24 and Fedora rawhide. Andrea Bolognani (5): wireshark: Introduce $ws_modversion wires