On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:42:54AM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2017 11:00 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:27:32PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> >> Rather than have them mixed in with the virutil apis, create a separate
> >> virvhba.c module and move the vHBA
On 02/17/2017 11:00 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:27:32PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
>> Rather than have them mixed in with the virutil apis, create a separate
>> virvhba.c module and move the vHBA related calls into there. Soon there
>> will be more added.
>>
>> Also
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 03:27:32PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> Rather than have them mixed in with the virutil apis, create a separate
> virvhba.c module and move the vHBA related calls into there. Soon there
> will be more added.
>
> Also modify the names of the functions and some arguments to
Rather than have them mixed in with the virutil apis, create a separate
virvhba.c module and move the vHBA related calls into there. Soon there
will be more added.
Also modify the names of the functions and some arguments to be more
indicative of what is really happening. Adjust the callers