On 10/8/19 2:51 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> I'll respin to hit the tests with a stiffer scrub-brush.
> Thanks!
051 is the only test I can find that uses ide-drive, and the non-pc
version of the test doesn't seem to use it, so this actually seems
sufficient.
I'd like to keep the test for
John Snow writes:
> On 10/7/19 5:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or ide-hd.
>>> I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the super-object
>>> will make that easier.
>>
>> Device "scsi-disk"
On 10/7/19 5:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow writes:
>
>> It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or ide-hd.
>> I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the super-object
>> will make that easier.
>
> Device "scsi-disk" is similar. However,
John Snow writes:
> It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or ide-hd.
> I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the super-object
> will make that easier.
Device "scsi-disk" is similar. However, it's still used by the
scsi_bus_legacy_add_drive() magic. Not
On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 16:31:50 -0400, John Snow wrote:
> It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or ide-hd.
> I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the super-object
> will make that easier.
>
> Either way, we don't need this.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Snow
It's an old compatibility shim that just delegates to ide-cd or ide-hd.
I'd like to refactor these some day, and getting rid of the super-object
will make that easier.
Either way, we don't need this.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
qemu-deprecated.texi | 5 +
hw/ide/qdev.c
