On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
> > its capabilities, the VM is left running. Next time the daemon is
> > starting, it
On 2014/10/9 19:08, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:52:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:37:42PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:49:34 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, D
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:52:49AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:37:42PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:49:34 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:49:34AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
> >>its capabilit
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:37:42PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:49:34 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > >On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > >> When daemon is kil
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:49:34 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >> When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
> >> its capabilit
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:45:50 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > > When daemon is killed r
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
its capabilities, the VM is left running. Next time the daemon is
starting, it cannot sta
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
> > > its capabilities,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:14:48 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
> > its capabilities, the VM is left running. Next time the daemon is
> > starting, it cann
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:58:30AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
> its capabilities, the VM is left running. Next time the daemon is
> starting, it cannot start qemu process because the one that's already
> running does hav
When daemon is killed right in the middle of probing a qemu binary for
its capabilities, the VM is left running. Next time the daemon is
starting, it cannot start qemu process because the one that's already
running does have the pidfile flock()'d.
Reported-by: Wang Yufei
Signed-off-by: Martin K
12 matches
Mail list logo
