On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 17:24:42 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
On 06/28/2013 11:04 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
---
src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c | 21 ++---
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 29 +
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+),
Il 02/07/2013 08:34, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
I'm not sure if that's
the right think to do or not but it's certainly better than before when
memory locking limit completely ignore the need for VRAM and per-disk
cache. Unfortunately, the original formula was suggested by Avi, who
moved to new
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:34:44 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/07/2013 08:34, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
I'm not sure if that's
the right think to do or not but it's certainly better than before when
memory locking limit completely ignore the need for VRAM and per-disk
cache.
Il 02/07/2013 13:40, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:34:44 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/07/2013 08:34, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
I'm not sure if that's
the right think to do or not but it's certainly better than before when
memory locking limit completely ignore the
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 13:51 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/07/2013 13:40, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:34:44 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/07/2013 08:34, Jiri Denemark ha scritto:
I'm not sure if that's
the right think to do or not but it's certainly better
---
src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c | 21 ++---
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 29 +
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c b/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c
index 5f54ca6..22bf78e 100644
---
On 06/28/2013 11:04 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
---
src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c | 21 ++---
src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 29 +
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c
