On 27.10.2016 02:13, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the rule should really be part of this series.
>
> I am working on udev hook-up. I found out that SECLABEL key doesn't
> support substitutions (see %c in man 7
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> IIUC, we can possibly achieve our goal using GOTO, with two rules.
>
> In a 00-libvirt-early.rules have a rule that runs libvirt_udevhelper
> and adds a "GOTO=libvirt-end". Then in zz-libvirt-late.rules
>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> We absolutely don't want to be delegating permissions setting/labelling
> to udev & waiting for it to complete asychronously in the background.
> That leads to two completely different approaches for labelling
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:13:28AM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>
> > Yeah, the rule should really be part of this series.
>
> I am working on udev hook-up. I found out that SECLABEL key doesn't
> support
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> Yeah, the rule should really be part of this series.
I am working on udev hook-up. I found out that SECLABEL key doesn't
support substitutions (see %c in man 7 udev). I need to fix that first
and then we can have very
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 15:08:37 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:37:02AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 17:39:35 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 26,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> We should never be spawning a VM using a disk at the same time as the
> underlying device is appearing - other unrelated devices may be
> appearing/disappearing at this time, but not the one the VM is using.
>
> The
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:02:33PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
>
> > We can not do any sychronous wait against udev doing work - that will
> > add an unacceptable delay in the VM startup process - it is
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> We can not do any sychronous wait against udev doing work - that will
> add an unacceptable delay in the VM startup process - it is already
> too long and we don't want to design a system that will make it even
>
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:37:59PM +0200, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
> wrote:
>
> > We absolutely don't want to be delegating permissions setting/labelling
> > to udev & waiting for it to complete asychronously in the
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:37:02AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 17:39:35 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > > This is a small
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:37:02AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 17:39:35 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > This is a small helper intended to be run by udev. On its input
> > > (either as the only
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 17:39:35 +0200, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > This is a small helper intended to be run by udev. On its input
> > (either as the only command line argument or in DEVNODE
> > environment vairable) it is
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This is a small helper intended to be run by udev. On its input
> (either as the only command line argument or in DEVNODE
> environment vairable) it is given a device and on the output it
> will either put nothing (meaning the
This is a small helper intended to be run by udev. On its input
(either as the only command line argument or in DEVNODE
environment vairable) it is given a device and on the output it
will either put nothing (meaning the device is not used by any of
the libvirt domains), or it will print out
15 matches
Mail list logo