On 07/12/2016 02:05 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:55:01PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> The old 32-bit-only mingw project had a mismatch in its
>> that omitted ssize_t, but where size_t was a different rank than
>> int. But now that mingw64 (both 32- and 64-bit) is the
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:55:01PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> The old 32-bit-only mingw project had a mismatch in its
> that omitted ssize_t, but where size_t was a different rank than
> int. But now that mingw64 (both 32- and 64-bit) is the more
> popular platform (Fedora has dropped mingw in
The old 32-bit-only mingw project had a mismatch in its
that omitted ssize_t, but where size_t was a different rank than
int. But now that mingw64 (both 32- and 64-bit) is the more
popular platform (Fedora has dropped mingw in favor of mingw64),
we no longer need to carry a hack to gnulib to
