On 09/25/2018 06:29 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
>
>
> On 9/21/18 5:29 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> There is one caller (virSecurityManagerMetadataLock) which
>> duplicates the connection FD and wants to have the flag set.
>> However, trying to set the flag after dup() is not safe as
>> another
On 9/21/18 5:29 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> There is one caller (virSecurityManagerMetadataLock) which
> duplicates the connection FD and wants to have the flag set.
> However, trying to set the flag after dup() is not safe as
> another thread might fork() meanwhile. Therefore, switch to
>
There is one caller (virSecurityManagerMetadataLock) which
duplicates the connection FD and wants to have the flag set.
However, trying to set the flag after dup() is not safe as
another thread might fork() meanwhile. Therefore, switch to
duplicating with the flag set and only let callers refine
