On Fri, 27 May 2016 17:32:34 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 May 2016 09:34:05 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Igor
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 09:34:05 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 6 May 2016 15:11:31 -0300
> > > Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, 24 May 2016 09:34:05 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 May 2016 15:11:31 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > This makes the feature name tables in
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:17:03PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016 15:11:31 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > This makes the feature name tables in feature_word_info all match
> > the actual QOM property names we use.
> >
> > This will make the
On Fri, 6 May 2016 15:11:31 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This makes the feature name tables in feature_word_info all match
> the actual QOM property names we use.
>
> This will make the command-line interface more consistent,
> allowing the QOM property names to be used
On Fri, 6 May 2016 15:11:31 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This makes the feature name tables in feature_word_info all match
> the actual QOM property names we use.
>
> This will make the command-line interface more consistent,
> allowing the QOM property names to be used
This makes the feature name tables in feature_word_info all match
the actual QOM property names we use.
This will make the command-line interface more consistent,
allowing the QOM property names to be used as "-cpu" arguments
directly.
Add extra feat2prop() calls to x86_cpu_parse_featurestr() to