[libvirt] [PATCH LIBVIRT] libxl: Recognise ARM architectures

2014-02-26 Thread Ian Campbell
Only tested on v7 but the v8 equivalent seems pretty obvious. XEN_CAP_REGEX already accepts more than it should (e.g. x86_64p or x86_32be) but I have stuck with the existing pattern. With this I can create a guest from: domain type='xen' namelibvirt-test/name

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH LIBVIRT] libxl: Recognise ARM architectures

2014-02-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:17PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: Only tested on v7 but the v8 equivalent seems pretty obvious. XEN_CAP_REGEX already accepts more than it should (e.g. x86_64p or x86_32be) but I have stuck with the existing pattern. With this I can create a guest from:

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH LIBVIRT] libxl: Recognise ARM architectures

2014-02-26 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 12:37 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:17PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: Currently virsh console fails with: Connected to domain libvirt-test Escape character is ^] error: internal error: cannot find character device null I

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH LIBVIRT] libxl: Recognise ARM architectures

2014-02-26 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/26/2014 05:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:17PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: Only tested on v7 but the v8 equivalent seems pretty obvious. XEN_CAP_REGEX already accepts more than it should (e.g. x86_64p or x86_32be) but I have stuck with the existing

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH LIBVIRT] libxl: Recognise ARM architectures

2014-02-26 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 06:34 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: On 02/26/2014 05:37 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:17PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: Only tested on v7 but the v8 equivalent seems pretty obvious. XEN_CAP_REGEX already accepts more than it should (e.g.