Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:07:10AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> At least with systemd v210, NOTIFY_SOCKET is abstact, e.g.
>> @/org/freedesktop/systemd1/notify. sendmsg() fails on such a socket
>> with "Connection refused". The unix(7) man page contains the following
>>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:07:10AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> At least with systemd v210, NOTIFY_SOCKET is abstact, e.g.
> @/org/freedesktop/systemd1/notify. sendmsg() fails on such a socket
> with "Connection refused". The unix(7) man page contains the following
> details wrt abstract socket
At least with systemd v210, NOTIFY_SOCKET is abstact, e.g.
@/org/freedesktop/systemd1/notify. sendmsg() fails on such a socket
with "Connection refused". The unix(7) man page contains the following
details wrt abstract socket addresses
abstract: an abstract socket address is distinguished (from a
