On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:52:20AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On some platforms the number of bits in the cbm_mask might not be
> divisible by 4 (and not even by 2), so we need to properly count the
> bits. Similar file, min_cbm_bits, is properly parsed and used, but if
> the number is
Thanks martin,
Looks good to me.
On Friday, 9 June 2017 at 4:52 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On some platforms the number of bits in the cbm_mask might not be
> divisible by 4 (and not even by 2), so we need to properly count the
> bits. Similar file, min_cbm_bits, is properly parsed and
On some platforms the number of bits in the cbm_mask might not be
divisible by 4 (and not even by 2), so we need to properly count the
bits. Similar file, min_cbm_bits, is properly parsed and used, but if
the number is greater than one, we lose the information about
granularity when reporting the
