On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 03:57:11PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
> v1 took a simplistic approach:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-October/msg00919.html
>
> but not specific enough according to the review. So adding some extra
> complexity of checking for specific errors and flag
v1 took a simplistic approach:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-October/msg00919.html
but not specific enough according to the review. So adding some extra
complexity of checking for specific errors and flag bits to "ignore" the
error similar to the catch-all openflags