On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 07:04:35AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 11:12 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > On 10/30/2017 03:31 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2017 07:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue,
On 10/30/2017 11:12 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 03:31 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 07:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>
On 10/30/2017 03:31 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote:
On 10/03/2017 07:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
It comes handy
On 10/03/2017 07:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
It comes handy for management application to be able to
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 01:01 PM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 01:26:54PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:40:01 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > > On 10/05/2017 10:10
On 10/05/2017 01:01 PM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:40:01 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:28:35AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 11:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 11:27:29AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 04:03:20PM +0200,
On 10/05/2017 11:13 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Daniel P.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 10:44:29AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at
On 10/05/2017 10:10 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 04:03:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 08:31:36AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 04:03:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:53:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > On Tue,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:10:48PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 04:03:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:53:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03,
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 04:03:20PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:53:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:53:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
>
> It comes handy for management
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 02:11:44PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
> >
> > It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
> > per-device label so that it can
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:58:59PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
cares about. The advantage of this approach is that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434451
It comes handy for management application to be able to have a
per-device label so that it can uniquely identify devices it
cares about. The advantage of this approach is that we don't have
to generate aliases at define time (non trivial amount
22 matches
Mail list logo