On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:24:41PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 04/16/2015 10:06 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:21:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171933
Adjust the processLU error returns to be a bit more logical.
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:21:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171933
Adjust the processLU error returns to be a bit more logical. Currently,
the calling code cannot determine the difference between a non disk/lun
volume and a processed/found
On 04/16/2015 10:06 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:21:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171933
Adjust the processLU error returns to be a bit more logical. Currently,
the calling code cannot determine the difference between a non
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171933
Adjust the processLU error returns to be a bit more logical. Currently,
the calling code cannot determine the difference between a non disk/lun
volume and a processed/found disk/lun. It can also not differentiate
between perhaps real/fatal error
