On 09/18/2017 12:34 PM, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Since we have a number of places where we workaround timing issues with
> devices, attributes (files in general) not being available at the time
> of processing them by calling usleep in a loop for a fixed number of
> tries, we could as well have a u
Since we have a number of places where we workaround timing issues with
devices, attributes (files in general) not being available at the time
of processing them by calling usleep in a loop for a fixed number of
tries, we could as well have a utility function that would do that.
Therefore we won't
