Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv5 04/23] blockjob: add new API flags

2012-04-23 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/18/2012 08:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 18/04/2012 16:18, Jiri Denemark ha scritto: >> However, the question is whether we feel comfortable enough with pushing this >> with the risk that qemu implementation is not upstream yet. I think the API >> is >> sane but the history of pushing som

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv5 04/23] blockjob: add new API flags

2012-04-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 18/04/2012 16:18, Jiri Denemark ha scritto: > However, the question is whether we feel comfortable enough with pushing this > with the risk that qemu implementation is not upstream yet. I think the API is > sane but the history of pushing something that qemu ended up implementing in a > differen

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv5 04/23] blockjob: add new API flags

2012-04-18 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 23:05:55 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > This patch introduces a new block job, useful for live storage > migration using pre-copy streaming. Justification for including > this under virDomainBlockRebase rather than adding a new command > includes: 1) there are now two possible

[libvirt] [PATCHv5 04/23] blockjob: add new API flags

2012-04-16 Thread Eric Blake
This patch introduces a new block job, useful for live storage migration using pre-copy streaming. Justification for including this under virDomainBlockRebase rather than adding a new command includes: 1) there are now two possible block jobs in qemu, with virDomainBlockRebase starting either type